Now it came about at the lodging-place on the way that the Lord met him and sought to put him to death. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son’s foreskin and threw it at Moses’ feet, and she said, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me.” So He let him alone. At that time she said, “You are a bridegroom of blood” – because of the circumcision.
One cannot read the text
above without wondering what on earth is going on. God had just finished giving Moses an
incredible assignment that required him to return to Egypt and now on the
journey, God meets him (possibly, as Matthew Henry suggests, via a
sword-wielding angel) and seeks to put him to death. Well, let us see what we can make of it.
Clearly, the overwhelming
opinion of almost all who write on this subject is that God was angry with
Moses because he had not circumcised his son.
As this was a major instruction as part of the covenant God had made
with His people, there was no way God would use Moses as long as this was the
case. Some think he did circumcise his
first-born in keeping with God’s commands, but his wife, Zipporah, was so
appalled at the blood-filled rite that she out rightly refused to allow Moses
to have their second son go through the same experience. So, when God attacked Moses, it was Zipporah
who knew what it was all about and put a stop to it by doing what she did.
But let me go out on a limb
here and suggest something very different, only as a possibility.
The first thing that comes to
our attention is that this happened “at a lodging-place” on the way to
Egypt. This phrase may suggest that this
account happened during the night, while Moses was sleeping, and that it was
all a dream. We cannot be adamant about
that, but the prospect exists. We also
note that the action changes very quickly, without notice or normal transition,
from the Lord seeking to put him to death to his wife circumcising his son and
yelling at Moses. [Some would argue that
the author of Exodus, Moses himself, did not want to give us all the details
but I am not so sure, based on his usual writing style elsewhere, that he would
have spared us as many details as he seems to.] All of this leads me to accept
the dream hypothesis as a very plausible one.
There is lots of action, with no strong evident connecting points. It makes even more sense when we consider
that Moses was weary from his travels and had much on his mind as he considered
the future.
Of course, one could also
take the ‘literal’ approach. But here
are the implications -- God in the form of an angel, commences to attack
Moses. Did Zipporah actually see the actual
Lord in order to put a stop to the fighting as the text may suggest? Again, I do not think so. Moses’ wife, Zipporah, ‘surprises’ God by, rather
than coming to Moses’ defense, she actually blames her husband for what is
going on. She expresses her strong
feelings by circumcising her son right there and then (could she really do this
successfully especially given the fact she thought it so abhorrent? Perhaps)
and throwing the foreskin at Moses’ feet (further proof of her anger) while
calling him a “bridegroom of blood” which the text says refers to the fact that
Moses had tried to introduce circumcision to her family but she had resisted
and Moses never insisted on doing so. As
a result of her actions, God stops His attack on Moses, or otherwise, we can
surmise, He would have killed him. For
all the above, I tend to think that the account here cannot easily be taken
literally.
There is yet another school
of thought that makes a lot of sense. It
suggests that Moses was fully aware of his sin and during the night, while
examining his relationship with God, he realized its presence. This may have driven him temporarily mad or
to become mentally undone because of his failure to please God, especially as
he knew he was going to lead the people of Israel for God. This in turn may have resulted in a fever or
a seizure, causing Zipporah to be greatly alarmed. Or, this realization of Moses was followed by
a one of those husband-wife discussions that turns into an argument, in this
case over the matter of the circumcision of their son. Worried about her husband as well as possibly
her own future, she goes out and circumcises her son, not willing to fight it
any longer. (She uses a piece of flint
rock readily available in the dessert there – evidence of which I have seen
myself in a visit to Israel.)
We will not know the answer
to the question of what really took place in the physical world until we can
ask our Lord. But as always, we should
try to see what this account given in scripture might have to say to us. What can we learn from it?
Whether the action portrayed
here literally happened or whether it was a direction given to Moses in a
dream, does not change the ‘content’ of what God was trying to convey to him,
and perhaps to us. The fact that God is
willing to use you and me to accomplish His plan for mankind does not mean that
He is willing to accept sin in our lives.
Sometimes He expects us to get rid of it ourselves; other times He’ll
see to it that it is eliminated. Either
way, the sin has to go before He fully engages us in executing the plan He
wants us to carry out.
Maybe the sin standing in
your way is not as obvious as the one Moses committed by failing to carry out a
key commandment of God’s. Maybe it is
just an attitude or a desire or a stubbornness based on false premises. Maybe it is a sin of commission, but it could
also be a sin of omission. Whatever it
is, we must identify it, confess it, and end it.
The implication in our
passage is that Moses had his sin dealt with – either by Zipporah at the time
God was fighting with him, or by his own action afterwards, if this were a
dream. We know that for God, as later verses
and chapters tell us, allowed him to live and to carry out the purpose for
which He had selected him. It is my
prayer that this be true in our lives as well.
I pray we can all be ready to do whatever it takes to eliminate any sin in
our lives preventing God from using us in the way He wants to.
It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment.