Showing posts with label food. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 11, 2020

Watch what you eat and don't forget to give God what is His. Period.

 

Deuteronomy Chapter 14: The Laws of Food and Tithes
Deuteronomy 14:1-29 – Gems and Thoughts from the Passage

In the first 21 verses of this chapter, Moses repeats the Law about not ‘cutting’ our bodies or ‘shaving’ our foreheads “for the sake of the dead” and also what they cannot eat and what they can eat.

In verses 22 to 29, Moses reviews for the sons of Israel the Law of the Tithes. They are reminded how they are to tithe and not to forget the Levites or the priests and their needs. But of special interest to me was in verses 24 to 26. These talk about the situation where it was too far to take the “tithes of the field” to bring before the Lord, then they could sell the harvests or animals that were supposed to be a tithe, and then carry the money to where God wants them to give it to the Lord, then locally buy animals, etc., and then present their tithes.  Wow. That’s a God that wants to make it easy for us to follow His commands. It reminds me of how churches these days are encouraging many of their congregants to send in their tithes and offerings, by email, by direct deposit, etc.

Wrap-up

This is very much a repeat chapter of things already told to the Israelites by Moses. That very fact – that it is a repeat – just highlights how important these Laws are.  What we eat may no longer matter in terms of Jewish laws of cleanliness, but they certainly matter in terms of staying healthy today given all the processed foods and all the junk foods around.

Similarly, tithing is still very important to the carrying on of the church and the sharing of the Gospel.

Bottom line – watch what you eat and don’t forget to give God what is His rightful share, keeping in mind that all of what you and I have are only gifts from Him in the first place.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Wednesday, April 15, 2020

"Obedience leads to true freedom. . . ." captures the essence of this Old Testament passage.

Leviticus 26:1-13 Basic Requirements, Conditions, and Results of Obedience
Day 28. Celebrating (not sure that’s the right word) 4 weeks of self-isolation, the first two of which were mandatory self-quarantine. Today I had the privilege of teaching the first day of a three-day on-line class to Human Resources personnel in Canada and the U.S. So, my socializing was via Zoom. It was a welcomed relief. My study in Leviticus continues even if later in the day. The stress of family and friends beyond our immediate household continues due to the isolation, the loss of work, etc. But God is still there and He upholds us. Thanks for joining me today and read on.

I do not often quote leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but I thought this quote of James E. Faust, a famous Mormon religious leader, lawyer, and politician, well reflected the contents of our passage today:

"Obedience leads to true freedom. The more we obey revealed truth,
the more we become liberated."
The Passage
26 ‘You shall not make for yourselves [a]idols, nor shall you set up for yourselves an image or a sacred pillar, nor shall you place a figured stone in your land to bow down [b]to it; for I am the Lord your God. You shall keep My sabbaths and reverence My sanctuary; I am the Lord. If you walk in My statutes and keep My commandments so as to carry them out, then I shall give you rains in their season, so that the land will yield its produce and the trees of the field will bear their fruit. Indeed, your threshing will last for you until grape gathering, and grape gathering will last until sowing time. You will thus eat your [c]food to the full and live securely in your land. I shall also grant peace in the land, so that you may lie down with no one making you tremble. I shall also eliminate harmful beasts from the land, and no sword will pass through your land. But you will chase your enemies and they will fall before you by the sword; five of you will chase a hundred, and a hundred of you will chase ten thousand, and your enemies will fall before you by the sword. So I will turn toward you and make you fruitful and multiply you, and I will confirm My covenant with you. 10 You will eat the old supply and clear out the old because of the new. 11 Moreover, I will make My [d]dwelling among you, and My soul will not [e]reject you. 12 I will also walk among you and be your God, and you shall be My people. 13 I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt so that you would not be their slaves, and I broke the bars of your yoke and made you walk erect.

Footnotes:

  1. Leviticus 26:1 Or graven images
  2. Leviticus 26:1 Lit over
  3. Leviticus 26:5 Lit bread
  4. Leviticus 26:11 Or tabernacle
  5. Leviticus 26:11 Lit abhor
Thoughts on the Passage
David Guzik says that as a literary form, “this chapter is similar to ancient treaties between a king and his people; this is God the King, making a covenant with His people, Israel.
Idols or inanimate objects (pillars, stone, etc.) are out. Robert Jamieson says this about these pillars of stone:
[A pillar of stone] is, an obelisk, inscribed with hieroglyphical and superstitious characters; the former denoting the common and smaller pillars of the Syrians or Canaanites; the latter, pointing to the large and elaborate obelisks which the Egyptians worshipped as guardian divinities, or used as stones of adoration to stimulate religious worship. The Israelites were [urged and warned] to beware of them.
You don’t bow down to anything. You keep the Sabbath and reverence the Sanctuary of God. You walk in His statutes and keep His commandments.  That’s the input.
Here’s the outputs: In verse 4, God promises enough rain to yield corps and fruits. And these will be so good that your whole year will be taken up with the associated activities (verse 5). He also promises that we will have sufficient food and live securely in our land.
In verse 6, God promises peace – the kind of peace that allows us to sleep at night. [Unlike the sleep people had during WWI and WWII – being awakened by sirens when the bombing was about to start.] But not only peace from human enemies, but also peace from wild beasts.
In fact, God says (in verses 7 and 8) that the Israelites, His people, will be able to chase our enemies and conquer them, even if they outnumber us twenty to one, or 100 to one.
But better still, God says (verse 9), He will turn towards the Israelites and make them fruitful with offspring and confirm His covenant with them.
Verse 10 is an interesting verse which states that the Israelites will “eat the old supply and clear it out” because He will keep giving them a new supply. Jamieson puts it another way when he says the Israelites will have so much grain that they won’t be able to exhaust it before the next year’s crop is ready to store – so they’ll have to throw some out. That’s bountiful supply.
And then it gets better in verse 11. God will dwell among them and I love, His “soul will reject” them. Wow. Can you imagine that kind of assurance? That kind of promise? A promise that He will walk with them and be their God and they His people. What more could anyone with any amount of smarts would want?
And why would He do all this if they keep His commandments? Simple: Because He is the Lord their God Who brought them out of slavery, freed them, and broke their chains so they would never be slaves again, but instead they could walk “erect” like free men. You have to love that kind of God. Guzik says this about the verse:
This final blessing speaks of freedom and dignity. This passage almost feels like the New Testament, God proclaims the liberty of His people and then invites them to walk in it.
Chuck Smith points out the things that God promised the Israelites here are the very things men are looking for today – security and peace and growth. Jesus says we can have all these things but not if we seek them, but only if we seek first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness (Matthew 6:33).
Matthew Henry points out that in His promises, God covers all of man’s basic needs in one or another. This is amazing. God knows the man He has created and knows our needs. And His promises take care of all we need. From physical protection, to food, to family growth, and to respect or dignity.
And amazingly, even though this chapter is in the Old Testament, the same promises have been applied to God’s children today – through His Son, Jesus Christ.  What a passage this is.  Do the five things God wants us to do, and God will the myriad of things He promises. In business we would call this a “no-brainer”.  But yet so many miss out of the deal of eternity.
So just remember as you wait out this Covid-19 storm, as a Child of His, you are well taken care of. Throw the worry away. Throw the fear away. Today I saw this image on social media and I think it fits well here.

-->
Fear survives at the expense of Faith in God. Increase your Faith in God as your Provider of all your needs and reclaim your lost peace that your fear has stolen. 

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Wednesday, April 08, 2020

Have the Rules been relaxed as to who can serve in the priesthood?

Leviticus 21:16-24 People Prohibited from the Priesthood
While some are awaiting the end of Lent and their fasting, many more this year are awaiting the end of “required self-isolation” and “social distancing”. For us today marks the end of three weeks (two self-quarantine due to returning from the U.S. and one at the on-going request of the powers that be). As a result, it has been five weeks since we have seen our youngest grandchildren who live less than half an hour away. Most outlooks now look towards May 4th for the possible easing up on this and perhaps the re-opening of our schools. Life goes on.  Some handling it better than others. Reading our Bibles is a big comfort for the believer. My study in Leviticus continues.  Thanks for joining me. Today we look at who God didn’t want in the service of the priesthood.
The Passage
Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 17 “Speak to Aaron, saying, ‘No man of your offspring throughout their generations who has a defect shall approach to offer the food of his God. 18 For no one who has a defect shall approach: a blind man, or a lame man, or he who has a disfigured face, or any deformed limb, 19 or a man who has a broken foot or broken hand, 20 or a hunchback or a dwarf, or one who has a defect in his eye or eczema or scabs or crushed testicles. 21 No man among the descendants of Aaron the priest who has a defect is to come near to offer the Lord’s offerings by fire; since he has a defect, he shall not come near to offer the food of his God. 22 He may eat the food of his God, both of the most holy and of the holy, 23 only he shall not go in to the veil or come near the altar because he has a defect, so that he will not profane My sanctuaries. For I am the Lord who sanctifies them.’” 24 So Moses spoke to Aaron and to his sons and to all the sons of Israel.
Thoughts on the Passage
It is very clear from this passage that God did not want any man (from the family of the High Priest, Aaron) that had a physical defect of any kind to follow in the footsteps of Aaron – that is, to become a priest. And that this requirement was to be for “all generations” that followed.
What God did not want was for His sanctuaries to be defiled or profaned in any way with any blemish.
In verse 22, however, such a person in the family of Aaron was still allowed to “eat the food that was for the priests in the process of it being presented to God” and that got David Guzik to write:
This indicates that those in priestly families could be supported by the priesthood.  The barring of physically defective persons as priests was no bar to fellowship with God, only a bar against the public service of God in the tabernacle itself.
This then begs the question, why were these men of Aaron’s family excluded from the office of priest? Again, Guzik helps us out here:
This obviously shows God’s standard for those who would come before Him in service as priests. The prohibition against those with physical defects was meant to point to the even more obvious need to be free from spiritual defect when coming to God.
Robert Jamieson suggests it was to allow for others to focus on what was being done rather than the blemish of the priest, and he writes:
As visible things exert a strong influence on the minds of men, any physical infirmity or malformation of body in the ministers of religion, which disturbs the associations or excites ridicule, tends to detract from the weight and authority of the sacred office.
Matthew Henry points out that what matters in those days with respect to who could be a priest and who could not, was whether or not those that couldn’t be would be taken care of by the rest of family.  And of course, God made provision for that.  However, in today’s society, the concern would be about whether or not taking God’s approach amounts to a Human Rights or Equal Opportunity violation. My how we have changed the way God wants us to live and take care of each other.
Henry says that God made this requirement for no blemish, etc. here . . . 
For the preserving of the reputation of his altar, that it might not at any time fall under contempt. It was for the credit of the sanctuary that none should appear there who were any way disfigured, either by nature or accident.
Henry does say things are different, however, under the New Testament where the Gospel of Christ takes over. He writes:
Under the gospel, those that labour under any such blemishes as these have reason to thank God that they are not thereby excluded from offering spiritual sacrifices to God; nor, if otherwise qualified for it, from the office of the ministry. There is many a healthful beautiful soul lodged in a crazy deformed body.

Yet, we ought to infer hence how incapable those are to serve God acceptably whose minds are blemished and deformed by any reigning vice. Those are unworthy to be called Christians, and unfit to be employed as minsters, that are spiritually blind, and lame, and crooked, whose sins render them scandalous and deformed, so as that the offerings of the Lord are abhorred for their sakes.. . . Let such therefore as are openly vicious be put out of the priesthood as polluted persons; and let all that are made to our God spiritual priests be before him holy and without blemish, and comfort themselves with this, that, though in this imperfect state they have spots that are the spots of God's children, yet they shall shortly appear before the throne of God without spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing.
And Moses passed this on to Aaron.
What is our take-away? God cares today about the minds and hearts of our clergy more than their physical deformities. And that’s why our elders and deacons need to keep an eye on our pastors and ministers by meeting with them regularly and checking out how they are doing in that regard.  Perhaps, the question to ask your pastor as you treat them to a coffee or a lunch next is, “How’s your heart, pastor?”
In addition, where the heart is not right and cannot or will not be fixed, it is incumbent on our elders and deacons to take the godly steps to remove those who would only keep the post out of ego or self-centredness.
Finally, we owe it to God’s servants to make sure they are compensated well in order to be able to provide for their families. Those who are deacons, elders, and even the lay people of the church have this as an awesome responsibility. Church boards should have an intentional process by which these needs are identified.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Saturday, March 09, 2019

God’s Commands re. the Earth’s Animals Present Us with a Dilemma

Leviticus 11:1-8
The Lord spoke again to Moses and to Aaron, saying to them, “Speak to the sons of Israel, saying, ‘These are the creatures which you may eat from all the animals that are on the earth. Whatever divides a hoof, thus making split hoofs, and chews the cud, among the animals, that you may eat. Nevertheless, you are not to eat of these, among those which chew the cud, or among those which divide the hoof: the camel, for though it chews cud, it does not divide the hoof, it is unclean to you. Likewise, the shaphan, for though it chews cud, it does not divide the hoof, it is unclean to you; the rabbit also, for though it chews cud, it does not divide the hoof, it is unclean to you; and the pig, for though it divides the hoof, thus making a split hoof, it does not chew cud, it is unclean to you. You shall not eat of their flesh nor touch their carcasses; they are unclean to you.

Thoughts on the Passage
Once again, we are faced with the dilemma of “how much of these commands apply to us today?”  The fact remains that not all of us follow these rules. We eat various foods mentioned in this passage.  Some don’t because they believe this applies to God’s people even today. Others don’t because science has said they are bad for us, at least in larger quantities.  Others just can’t stand the thought that they are eating some of them. Others won’t eat them because doing so is cruelty to animals.
So, what can we take from it all that most of us can agree with?
Chuck Smith says when we look at these practical laws, we need to be thinking of the spiritual laws that God has laid down for us. The bottom line is that if we seek to follow God’s laws we will be blessed and if we neglect to do so, we will not. And Smith has the references in Scripture that back him up. If we start with the Spiritual laws, including the law to obey God, the issue then becomes how far down the “commandments” towards the practical (read ‘food’ laws) do we need to go to still have the blessing?
Smith sees it this way. Those food laws show that God is in interested in our health and wants us to have strong bodies. If He were talking to us today about this topic, He would probably hit on ‘junk food’.  He shares the story about going “home from Bible school at night and buy ice cream and chocolate syrup and whipped cream and the whole thing. And then some guy would say, "Who's going to ask the blessing?" I said, "You can't ask God to bless this. It's no good for you, you know, it's not good for you." Eat it and take the consequences, but don't ask God to bless it.
On the other hand, we can’t misquote I Corinthians 10:23 where Paul states, “all things are lawful for me” and claim that we can eat all the pork, ham, and bacon we want. We cannot misquote God in Acts 11:9 when He says, “Don’t call unholy what I have cleaned.”  That does not mean you can eat anything you want. Why? Because the passage is not about food – it’s about Paul taking the message to the Gentiles who were considered ‘unclean’ by the Jews up to that point.
The animals God lists here as being off limits to the Jews were animals that carried disease, especially if not cooked thoroughly. This is especially a problem in warm climates, according to Robert Jamieson. David Guzik notes that God wasn’t just coming up with new rules here about what animals were clean and what were unclean. In fact, these distinctions were known way back in the days of Noah (Genesis 7:2 and 8:20).
Matthew Henry reminds us that “God’s Will” is a manifestation of “God’s Wisdom”. So, anything He commands that we obey is ultimately the wisest decision we could make.  God was interested in teaching His people then and His people now that we are to distinguish ourselves from other people, not only by our belief in Him, but also in our practices, day to day.
We just presented the background to these verses and tied them in with some other passages in both the Old and New Testaments. It is now up to each of us to become aware of what God had commanded, and to decide what He intends for us today, and then to follow through on that decision. Here’s to your health and mine.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Saturday, July 04, 2015

How Long Will "Independence Day" Survive? Author suggests these days are numbered.

-->
Biohistory: Decline and Fall of the West (book review)



I agreed to review this book because for sometime now I have sensed the demise of Western civilization but had no hard arguments as to how or why or when. I have now found them (or what I think may be them) in Jim Penman’s book, Biohistory: Decline and Fall of the West, published by Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K., 2015.

Penman, a Ph.D. [in History from Australia’s La Trobe University in 1983 and an Honorary Fellow and Guest Lecturer at RMIT University in Melbourne], is an Australian historian and social theorist. And in this book, he takes on the explanation of rises and falls observed in “civilization history” as well as predicting (with very little difficulty or hesitation) the collapse of modern Western civilization as we know it.  Penman is a very accomplished man but not necessarily in the academic circles where you would expect him to pop up now and again. This is a self-made man (he’s also CEO of Jim’s Group, Australia’s largest home services franchiser with over 3,400 franchisees in four countries, and growing at the rate of 200 per year) who has been using his spare moments (let alone his income) for the last 40 years to do research on his theory of Biohistory – the biological explanation for most of history, especially the causes of rises and falls of societies.

Penman’s theory is founded on the premise that a civilization fundamentally rises and falls based on the overall temperament of its populace. And temperament of a people is driven by many factors, not the least of which is the scarcity (or overabundance) of food.  Other factors are the amount of testosterone people have, the presence (or absence) of stress hormones, anxiety of mothers in one’s infancy, approaches to control and punishment at various pre-adulthood stages, and of course, the average age of puberty as well as the sexual activities or freedom of people.

His arguments as to how each one of these (and even more) factors impacts civilizations all make sense.  What is somewhat disconcerting (at least to a non-scientist) is the way he then explains anomalies by combining the various factors (high in one, low in another; early in one, later in another; etc.). No laity reader (at least not this one) can keep everything he says straight in order to be able to use the information provided as predictors in a different environment.

To his credit, Penman digs deep into both history and recent times for examples (both animal and human) from around the globe to give us solid proof that supports his theory.  He claims that what we need to consider is not genetics but rather epigenetics – the study of changes in organisms caused by modifications in gene expression rather than the alteration of the gene code itself.

Of particular interest also is his account of how religion impacts civilization positively to increase what he calls the C (civilization) factor – the epigenetics needed for a culture to rise.  But high C is not enough, he says.  Rising cultures need high V (aggression) to defeat their enemies and survive.  Considerable space is spent on how C and V rise and fall in a people, especially when combined with other factors such as timing, Lemming Cycles (you can discover these for yourself), war, recession and tyranny.  His parting theoretical shot at his formula is to stir in one more ingredient – the S (or stability) factor which has a lot to do with wanting to reproduce children to maintain the society, i.e. a civilization birth rate. It makes for fascinating reading.

With all the details out of the way, Penman reaches his three last chapters in the book. In one he deals first with “fundamentalists” (and no I don’t mean the Moral Majority type) and how they, all else being equal, have the greatest chance of survival.  He cites the original Israelite culture as found in the Old Testament and also fundamentalist (vs. liberal) Islam today as two excellent examples.  Then in the second last chapter he explains why the West is declining, and will continue to decline, with no easy way to stop it.  He even gives you a timeframe.  And you cannot argue with his arguments, especially if you buy any part of his theory.

It is his last chapter that threw me for a loop. Penman, very cautiously mind you, admitting that the only solution he has to offer as a means of stopping the current downward suicidal course of the West has its own downsides and will likely never easily be adopted, presents us with a picture of the future that makes Orwell’s 1984 seem more like a story about Cinderella. His solution – chemical supplements that bring about the desired epigenetics to help the rise and sustaining of a civilization.

Readers like me who object to that type of solution, and all that it conjures in ones mind, can well skip the book’s last chapter and still gain much to explain human behavior. I recommend it.

    -- Ken B. Godevenos, http://www.accordconsulting.com, Murrells Inlet, S.C. 15/07/04  

-->
Thanks for dropping by. Sign up to receive free updates. We bring you relevant information from all sorts of sources. Subscribe for free to this blog or follow us by clicking on the appropriate link in the right side bar. And please share this blog with your friends. Ken Godevenos, Church and Management Consultant, Accord Consulting.  And while you’re here, why not check out some more of our recent blogs shown in the right hand column.  Ken.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Friday, September 19, 2014

The Female Slave -- Exodus 21:7-11


“And if a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do.  If she is displeasing in the eyes of her master who designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed.  He does not have authority to sell her to a foreign people because of his unfairness to her.  And if he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her according to the custom of daughters.  If he takes to himself another woman, he may not reduce her food, her clothing or conjugal rights.  And if he will not do these three things for her, then she shall go out for nothing, without payment of money.”


The behavior suggested in the first phrase in this passage would result in criminal charges today.  Much has changed since the days of the Israelites in the wilderness. We can accept that slavery back then although abhorrent, was legal. What some of us may have more trouble accepting today is that God Himself was suggesting that the treatment of male slaves was to be different than the treatment of female slaves.  Whereas male slaves could go free after serving their masters for six years (see Exodus 21:2), female slaves did not have that benefit.  Why?
I think that rather than question God’s fairness in this situation we would be wise to read the entire passage.  In actual fact, a female slave was getting the better deal.  The whole purpose of God’s instructions for the female whose family was forced to sell her out of poverty, was ultimately that someone would be taking care of her.  The first thing we need to be aware of was that when a ‘maid-servant’ was bought, she was bought not really to be a slave, but rather to be the master’s wife or the wife of one of his sons some day, according to commentator David Guzik.  And if that was not to happen – the master did not marry her, or the sons did not want her -- she was to be redeemed preferably by their own family if they could afford to, but if not, her master could not sell her to a foreigner (or stranger).
Once a master gave the maidservant to his son, then from that point on she was to be treated as a daughter, not a slave. And as I read the next sentence, if the master or his son, once having accepted the maidservant as his wife, were to add more wives to his family (something else practiced in those days, but not condoned by God), then he had to ensure that the maidservant would still get the same allowances for food and clothing, and also have her conjugal rights (that is, the rights, especially to sexual relations, regarded as exercisable in law by each partner in a marriage).  Should these three things not be provided to her, she was free to leave and make her own way in society.  But through all of this, we can hopefully see that God was ensuring that the Hebrew women and daughters, whose own families could not afford to take care of them, would be protected.
_____________________________________________________________________

[Are you looking for a speaker at your church, your club, school, or organization? Ken is available to preach, teach, challenge, and/or motivate. Please contact us.]

Thanks for dropping by. Sign up to receive free updates. We bring you relevant information from all sorts of sources. Subscribe for free to this blog or follow us by clicking on the appropriate link in the right side bar. And please share this blog with your friends. Ken Godevenos, Church and Management Consultant, Accord Consulting.  And while you’re here, why not check out some more of our recent blogs shown in the right hand column.  Ken.
________________________________________________________________________

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Joseph Takes Their Liquid Assets In Exchange For Food - Genesis 47:15-17

And when the money was all spent in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came to Joseph and said, “Give us food, for why should we die in your presence? For our money is gone.”  Then Joseph said, “Give up your livestock, and I will give you food for your livestock, since your money is gone.”  So they brought their livestock to Joseph, and Joseph gave them food in exchange for the horses and the flocks and the herds and the donkeys; and he fed them with food in exchange for all their livestock that year.

Eventually our money runs out and we are left with our possessions that money has bought or possessions that have been given to us over the course of our lives.  What does not disappear however is our innate desire to survive.  For that we need the basics of life – shelter, clothing, water, and food  -- the latter being most necessary for long-term survival.  That was the state that almost all Egyptians and Canaanites were in after they had given all their money to Pharaoh for grain in the previous year.  Now, totally dependent on Joseph, they came begging for more food, but without money.

The ever-creative Joseph, realizing their fear of dying, asks them for their most valuable liquid assets – namely their cattle and other livestock, in exchange for grain.  And the people consent, eager to live for one more year.

As I read this portion of scripture two pictures come to mind.  The first is that of an addict (be it drugs or be it gambling or any other addiction you can name).  First the addict spends an ever-increasing amount of his/her income or wealth on their addiction.  Then things get so bad that all their money is spent on the addictive habit.  Finally, he/she is forced to give up their car, or their house, maybe even to ‘sell the whole family farm’.  I am not suggesting the people in our story here, the Egyptians and the Canaanites, were addicts.  Not at all – they simply needed to survive.  But the felt despair and the limited options one can take are the same when driven by either the need to survive or a terrible addiction.

The second picture I see is that of many a person today who is overcome with poverty or the inability to provide for his or her family.  This may be due to personal circumstances or to a great extent it may be due to the economy we live in where unemployment is as high as it is.  What can these verses possibly say to an individual in those circumstances?

Life is indeed most challenging at times.  And there are times we do need to take some drastic “giving-up-certain-things” type of action in order to survive or for the sake of our children and other family members.  But we must realize that we cannot do it alone.  We must realize that we need to put ourselves in the hands of God – not for what He can do for us right now – but for Who He is.  We must first yield totally to Him in all aspects of our life and then, living uprightly, we can seek the sound wisdom He has stored up for us as promised much further down the road in scripture, in Proverbs 2:7.  Charles Stanley describes living uprightly as obeying God and following through and doing what God commands of us.  If that is your situation today, I pray that you will have that willingness and deep desire to get through your difficult times, with God.

Today would also be a good time to consider whether we too are in any sort of similar circumstances to that of the people who gave Joseph their livestock.  Are we living in a state of addiction or fear or despair to the point where we would give up, perhaps in our case, unnecessarily something that we should not?  If so, may I suggest that there are options we have today.  There are alternatives that we can get help with.  There is no need to do what we know to be wrong.  Like the young unwed pregnant mother who, out of despair, sees no way out but to have an abortion, we must realize there are options.  There are people willing to help us do the right thing.  We need to seek them out and receive their help.


[Are you looking for a speaker at your church, your club, school, or organization? Ken is available to preach, teach, challenge, and/or motivate. Please contact us.]

Thanks for dropping by. Sign up to receive free updates. We bring you relevant information from all sorts of sources. Subscribe for free to this blog or follow us by clicking on the appropriate link in the right side bar. And please share this blog with your friends. Ken Godevenos, Church and Management Consultant, Accord Consulting.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Thursday, March 03, 2011

Record High World Food Prices -- What are You Doing?

Is it time to get back to the earth in our own backyards (assuming we have a backyard)? When we first came to Canada from Greece in 1953 and were fortunate enough to buy a home, my parents used the entire backyard to grow vegetables, etc. As they got older and more Canadianized that garden was pushed further and further back from the back door of the house -- until eventually it disappeared. I'm now living on that same property these days -- the land never changed hands for 58 years. We have no "vegetable" garden but perhaps we'll start thinking about it. What are you doing?

Please sharee this with others who may benefit.

World food prices hit record high: UN - World - CBC News

--Thanks for dropping by. Sign up to receive updates. -- Ken B. Godevenos, Church and Mgmt. Consultant, bringing you relevant information from all sorts of sources. Subscribe free to Epistoli or follow us by clicking on the appropriate link in the right side bar. And don’t forget to “share” this blog with your friends by clicking the “Share” link on your Navigation Bar.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.