Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2020

It's hard to see that God's Way is based on Justice, His Promise, and His Love -- but it is.


Numbers Chapter 31: Victory over Midian
Numbers 31:1-54
Day 89 of a recommended “stay at home” policy for our area. But many people are not staying at home.  They go out, some with masks, some without. There is considerable confusion about what works, what doesn’t; what’s open, what isn’t; and what’s mandatory and what isn’t. Welcome to the new order of mass (and mask) muddling. We stay the course, going about our business as best we can. On our daily walks each morning, at a rather fast clip, it is interesting to watch people of all ages clear the way for us, making sure there is no way they will come anywhere within six (but usually to be safe they make it easily 10 or 15) feet away.  Yet the government says we can now meet with ten people at a time without social distancing, and interestingly enough each of us can meet with nine different people each time.  So, where’s the logic in all this?  There isn’t any. But there’s always logic and justice and love in God’s Word, so we continue to study it.  Thanks for joining us.
The Passage
31 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Take full vengeance for the sons of Israel on the Midianites; afterward you will be gathered to your people.” Moses spoke to the people, saying, “Arm men from among you for the war, that they may [a]go against Midian to execute the Lord’s vengeance on Midian. A thousand from each tribe of all the tribes of Israel you shall send to the war.” So there were [b]furnished from the thousands of Israel, a thousand from each tribe, twelve thousand armed for war. Moses sent them, a thousand from each tribe, to the war, and Phinehas the son of Eleazar the priest, to the war with them, and the holy vessels and the trumpets for the alarm in his hand. So they made war against Midian, just as the Lord had commanded Moses, and they killed every male. They killed the kings of Midian along with the rest of their slain: Evi and Rekem and Zur and Hur and Reba, the five kings of Midian; they also killed Balaam the son of Beor with the sword. The sons of Israel captured the women of Midian and their little ones; and all their cattle and all their flocks and all their goods they plundered. 10 Then they burned all their cities where they lived and all their camps with fire. 11 They took all the spoil and all the prey, both of man and of beast. 12 They brought the captives and the prey and the spoil to Moses, and to Eleazar the priest and to the congregation of the sons of Israel, to the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by the Jordan opposite Jericho.
13 Moses and Eleazar the priest and all the leaders of the congregation went out to meet them outside the camp. 14 Moses was angry with the officers of the army, the captains of thousands and the captains of hundreds, who had come from service in the war. 15 And Moses said to them, “Have you [c]spared all the women? 16 Behold, these [d]caused the sons of Israel, through the [e]counsel of Balaam, to [f]trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, so the plague was among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man [g]intimately. 18 But all the [h]girls who have not known man [i]intimately, [j]spare for yourselves. 19 And you, camp outside the camp seven days; whoever has killed any person and whoever has touched any slain, purify yourselves, you and your captives, on the third day and on the seventh day. 20 You shall purify for yourselves every garment and every article of [k]leather and all the work of goats’ hair, and all articles of wood.”
21 Then Eleazar the priest said to the men of war who had gone to battle, “This is the statute of the law which the Lord has commanded Moses: 22 only the gold and the silver, the bronze, the iron, the tin and the lead, 23 everything that can stand the fire, you shall pass through the fire, and it shall be clean, but it shall be purified with water for impurity. But whatever cannot stand the fire you shall pass through the water. 24 And you shall wash your clothes on the seventh day and be clean, and afterward you may enter the camp.”
Verses 25-54 describe how the spoils taken from the slaughter were divided.

Footnotes

  1. Numbers 31:3 Lit be
  2. Numbers 31:5 Lit delivered
  3. Numbers 31:15 Lit let...live
  4. Numbers 31:16 Lit were to
  5. Numbers 31:16 Lit word
  6. Numbers 31:16 Possibly defect from the Lord
  7. Numbers 31:17 Lit by lying with a man
  8. Numbers 31:18 Lit female children
  9. Numbers 31:18 Lit by lying with a man
  10. Numbers 31:18 Lit keep alive
  11. Numbers 31:20 Or skin
Thoughts on the Passage
I must confess that this is one of the most difficult passages for me to read and/or study. The reasons are many as you’ll see in my comments below. It is a history of a “holy war” and it contains all the atrocities of war.
To begin with we have God’s instructions to Moses to “Take full vengeance for the sons of Israel on the Midianites”. I don’t know what God may have had in mind when He used that phrase “full vengeance”. But it sure sounds like “no holds barred” to me. Doesn’t sound like a loving God, many would claim. We must remember that God is also “just” and we will understand His reasoning for that instruction as we study the chapter further.
Secondly, in verse 2, we note that God instructed Moses to “go against Midian (in order) to execute the Lord’s vengeance on Midian.” This was God’s war, no one else’s. As difficult as it may be for us to accept that, we must again look for God’s reasons for doing so. And we’ll see that His reason made sense to a Holy God and thus should make sense to us, His people. We also know that because it was His war, victory was guaranteed. [And note also at the end of the chapter we learn that in this case success was total – not a single soldier of Israel’s was lost in the battle.] Vengeance when undertaken by God is a positive and necessary thing. It becomes evil when we undertake it. It is similar to the idea that we are not to take the law into our own hands in our society today.
Thirdly, God is telling Moses to lead his people in this war with the Midianites, after which Moses would “gathered to (his) people”, although this was not an “immediately afterwards”. This isn’t, “Hey Moses, just do this one more thing in your role as leader, and then you can retire.” No, it’s “do this one more thing and then you will die.” What kind of motivation was that? How did Moses do it? Well, the answer is twofold. First, we know the character of Moses and his commitment to obeying God and having complete trust in Him. Second, he realized that being gathered to his people was not such a bad deal under the circumstances after all. What a role model he is for us. He knew his role; he knew when he had accomplished his role; and he understand that God’s fairness and His word had to be fulfilled.
We also note in verse 6 that those that went to war included Phinehas the son of Eleazar the high priest (after the death of Aaron) and his priests. And they took with them the holy vessels and the trumpets with which to sound the alarm for the troops.
The Israelites engaged the Midianites and killed every male, including the five kings of Midian, and Balaam (which we remember was sought by Balak to curse Israel). He did not get his wish to die like the righteous because he wasn’t righteous. He was greedy and so he died with the unrighteous.
Now what the army of Israel did was capture the women and children, and all the cattle and flocks, and also plundered their possessions. They then burned everything to the ground. And they return home with their captives and the spoils. This was all in accordance with the custom of the day with respect to battles.
Matthew Henry points out that their triumphant march home was met with great respect when even the very aged Moses walked out of the camp to meet them. But then. . .
When Moses saw them, he was angry with their officers, and here comes another hard part, because he saw that they had “spared all the women”. Henry says he may well have been moved with a holy indignation at the sight of them, for you remember the law in the case of whoredom was that the adulterer and the adulteress should surely be put to death. God had taken care of the former, now He wanted the latter to be taken care of. They were supposed to have died as well. When God says, “full vengeance”, He means “full vengeance”. And then Moses gives us God’s reasoning for all of this when he says in verse 16 that it was the women who caused the sons of Israel, “through the counsel of Balaam”, to sin against the Lord which in turn caused the plague among the Israelites. God had His reasons for what He wanted done and Moses knew it.
Also, as Matthew Henry reminds us, God had already taken vengeance on his own people for being involved in this whole mess with the Midianites – remember the plague. Now He had to complete His exercise of justice on those that caused the problem. Furthermore, it is possible that God may have wanted to allow Moses the privilege of seeing revenge on the Midianites as he had been very angry at what had happened earlier as a result.
According to David Guzik, Moses may have also been angry “because the children of Israel failed to see the great danger of sexual immorality and idolatry posed by these women who before led the men of Israel into these exact sins.
So therefore, Moses now instructs the officers to kill all the male children they took captive and every woman who is not a virgin. And he offered them the virgins for themselves. Wow. They never taught me all this in Sunday School. What was Moses doing here? Why on earth would he give the Israelite men ungodly women to sleep with? Or was it that these women were simply to become their slaves? And why would kill young males? On this question, Guzik writes: “This was harsh, but done with the understanding that in that ancient culture, the boys would have grown into men with the solemn responsibility to avenge their father's death and to perpetuate Midianite culture - which in itself was anti-God.” And Robert Jamieson indicates that God had intended this war to be a war of extermination of an evil idolatrous people.
We stop here for a moment, because no doubt this action of God’s through the Israelites is a very hard concept for us. Chuck Smith suggests we need to understand a little about the culture of these and especially their religious practices. Marriage vows meant nothing. Bestiality was practiced. Human and especially child sacrifices to their gods were the order of the day. And God didn’t want them to pollute His children, the Israelites.
Of course, anyone who had killed any person or touched the dead were deemed unclean and had to remain outside the camp for seven days, and they along with their captives had to be purified on the third and seventh days of the isolation. And that included every piece of clothing as well as other articles (verse 20).
Verses 21-24 explain how Eleazar had them put everything through the fire, and only the precious metals that could withstand the fire would be considered ‘clean’.
In the section that describes how the spoils were to be divided, we note that everyone who went out to war was to get their share (50%) and the other half would be shared among the rest of the congregation. But a tax was to be levied on those things and given to Eleazar as an offering to the Lord (one for every 500 from the warriors and one for every 50 from the congregation’s half). In total there were over 800,000 animals that were captured (verses 32-34) and 32,000 virgins (verse 35).  And if I have this right, one wonders what the priest and his family would do with 352 virgins (32 from the warriors’ 16,000; and 320 for the congregation’s 16,000). No answer is provided to my knowledge.
The chapter ends with all the men who went out to war bringing to Moses and the Eleazar all the gold that they had taken in their plundering. And they did this because they were so thankful that not one single Israelite was lost in this battle.
What are the lessons we need to learn from this passage today?
First, what wars are we fighting? Are they ours or are they God’s? If they are ours, there is no guarantee we’ll win. If they are God’s, there is no way He’ll lose.
Second, that God’s way may not always seem right to us, but there is always validity in it. It is always based on one or more of three of His attributes as the Almighty Creator Father God: a) His execution of justice, b) His keeping of His word, and c) His love for His children. What God was doing here was exercising all three – He wanted justice for the sins of the Midianites, He kept His word as to what would happen, and He did it because He loved His people and wanted to protect them for the future. We can’t miss this.
And thirdly, this whole scenario is a foreshadowing, in my opinion, of exactly how God will deal with the world as a whole in due time. Justice will be served, His promises will be kept, and His people will be saved. That’s our God.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Monday, June 08, 2020

Women Seek Justice Due to their Gender and God Agrees.

Numbers 27:1-11 God Provides The Land Inheritance for Daughters Where There Are No Sons
Day 82. But not for New Zealand – all restrictions have been removed there.  Good for them. We’re still waiting our turn while our politicians seem to be experimenting with socialism and control. Meanwhile all over the U.S., people are demanding that their police departments either be defunded or totally eliminated. And they say after that, they’ll figure out how to keep their cities safe. People have lost all sense of right and wrong. The Black Lives Movement is causing quite a stir but more and more blacks themselves are speaking out against it with some very convincing evidence. Finally, as I watch social media each day now, I’m sensing a growing feeling of despair among many with comments like, “What’s the use?” or “It’s too late now.” Well, the Truth is that it is not too late at all. We can have a purpose, we can have hope, we can have peace, and we can love. And we do it all with God and by understanding His Word which gives us His Plan for the world. And so, we keep on trucking studying our Bible and even look for its gems in what most consider to be an otherwise uninteresting book – the book of Numbers. We discovered that it isn’t.  Read on.
The Passage
27 Then the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph, came near; and these are the names of his daughters: Mahlah, Noah and Hoglah and Milcah and Tirzah. They stood before Moses and before Eleazar the priest and before the leaders and all the congregation, at the doorway of the tent of meeting, saying, “Our father died in the wilderness, yet he was not among the company of those who gathered themselves together against the Lord in the company of Korah; but he died in his own sin, and he had no sons. Why should the name of our father be withdrawn from among his family because he had no son? Give us a possession among our father’s brothers.”So Moses brought their case before the Lord.
Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “The daughters of Zelophehad are right in their statements. You shall surely give them a hereditary possession among their father’s brothers, and you shall transfer the inheritance of their father to them. Further, you shall speak to the sons of Israel, saying, ‘If a man dies and has no son, then you shall transfer his inheritance to his daughter. If he has no daughter, then you shall give his inheritance to his brothers. 10 If he has no brothers, then you shall give his inheritance to his father’s brothers. 11 If his father has no brothers, then you shall give his inheritance to his nearest relative in his own family, and he shall possess it; and it shall be a statutory ordinance to the sons of Israel, just as the Lord commanded Moses.’”
Thoughts on the Passage
Here in this passage we have the female descendants of Joseph (you’ll remember his brothers sold him to some traders who in turn sold him in Egypt as a slave), some six generations later, coming to Moses with a complaint that involves fairness. We also note this appears, at least by this passage, that this the last dispute or concern that Moses has to deal with before dying.
These daughters stood before Moses and Eleazar pointing out the unfairness of their families not being given any land inheritance as they weren’t ‘sons’. Their father had no sons. As part of their case, they present the fact that while their father may have had his own sin, and thus rightfully died in the wilderness, he at least was not part of the company of Korah who rose up against the Lord. So, they were asking “Why then should we be punished?” And they simply asked for their “possession among their father’s brothers who had sons.” It does not sound like a ‘rocket-science’ issue for us today. These ‘daughters’ were right.
But clearly in those days, it was a patriarchal world and women only had the rights afforded to them by man. By now we should also know what Moses does when he is presented with a problem or an issue. He goes to God; and that is exactly what he did this time as well. And God responds.
Now we know that many accuse God and Christ and us Christians of not promoting the equality of women. I have always maintained that nothing could be furthest from the truth. I believe that women are honored by God, by Christ, and by true followers of our Lord’s. Many years ago I read a book that very eloquently and convincingly was able to put that argument in print. For those interested, the book is called: 
Slaves, Women & Homosexuals: Exploring the Hermeneutics of Culture Analysis
By Wm. J. Webb
Published by Intervarsity, 2001
 It is well worth looking into.  It shows the progression of how God started from the cultures that developed from the beginning of humanity, and move them along, pushing the envelope in the first two of these areas, right through to the New Testament church, but holding the line on the third.
With that in mind, the Lord doesn’t beat about the bush. He starts off His response to Moses by saying, “Look, these daughters are right in what they say. So, give them a hereditary possession among their father’s brothers, and transfer the inheritance of their father to them.”
God cares for what is right. He cares about these women who have no brothers to take them and their families in. Normally, brothers are responsible for their sisters. But where that is not possible, God steps in and does the job one way or another.
And God uses this opportunity to establish some other rules about how inheritance is supposed to work. He establishes the following rules:
1.     A man dies without having sons, inheritance goes to his daughter(s).
2.     If he has no daughter, to his brothers.
3.     If he has no brothers, to his nearest relative in his own family.
And the above was to be a statutory ordinance.

In my opinion, God has always been for justice and righteousness and for taking care of those in need. No woman’s lib organization or movement was needed. In an ideal patriarchal society, women were honored by being taken care of throughout their lives. In Christ’s time, He often spoke of women and with women and for women – all with high regard and esteem; and always with love and compassion. And today, the true Christian man honors his wife and loves her like Christ loves His church. The true Christian male today honors and loves his daughters. He protects them and thanks God for them. God was not a male chauvinist, neither was Christ. And neither is the true Christian male today.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Taking A Stand Against the Sport World's 'Turning a Blind Eye' to Physical Abuse



A friend of my recently wrote this letter and gave me permission to use it on social media.  It's a great read for those who love their women, daughters, nieces, granddaughters.  And who also love sports. Especially baseball.  Take a read and share

July 24, 2018

Mr. J. Natale
President  CEO
Rogers Communications Inc.
333 Bloor Street East
Toronto, OntarioM4W 1G9


Dear Mr. Natale

I'm writing to request that you review the Blue Jays' announced policy to essentially treat Roberto Osuna as if nothing had happened when he returns from his suspension.

I'm also writing as someone who owns Blue Jay season tickets that were originally purchased in 1977 and who attends 35 games a year and who is a long time subscriber of Rogers cable.

I will not re-articulate the argument against the Jay's policy since it was so effectively outlined in Marissa Stapley's July 14 opinion piece in the Globe.

I'm sure that Rogers and the Jays are following their HR policies, but I believe that in Mr. Osuna's case both need to be held to a higher, much higher, standard. Boys and young men see Mr. Osuna and his teammates as role models. You have the opportunity to impress on them that beating women is not acceptable. Please take that opportunity and not simply allow him to return as if he had not paid a few parking tickets.

Rogers should not allow John Gibbon's attitude that "I love the kid" and "I won't do anything to punish him" stand. He is not a kid. He is an adult employee of Rogers Communications and I find it hard to love, much less watch pitch, anyone who beats women. Nor should Ross Atkins' contention that "we are running a baseball team and our goal is to win championships" be allowed to stand. It would be a very hollow championship, if celebrating men who beat women is the price of winning it.

Rogers should turn its corporate presence and communications machine (including SportsNet) and the Blue Jays' visibility among boys and young men to send a very strong message that beating women is far, far from appropriate.

(Yes, I'm assuming his guilt based on the fact that it took nanoseconds for a restraining order to be issued; MLB took slightly longer, but suspended him and, as I understand it, he plans to plead guilty.)

I do not know yet how I will protest when I’m at a game if the Jays do not reverse their current position, but I do know that I will be switching my television service from Rogers to Bell should the Jays play Mr. Osuna before he is found innocent or if Rogers and the Jays do not do more, much more, than hang out a "Welcome back" sign, if he is found guilty. 

I will be equally angry at the criminal justice system if he is let off with "community service". This is not a man I want servicing my community until I know for sure that he is truly repentant, understands the seriousness of what he did and willingly speaks emphatically and frequently to boys and young men about the errors of his past ways.

I only met Ted Rogers a couple of times and then many years ago, but last night as I left the ROGERS Centre; walked past Ted ROGERS' statue and passed by the Ted ROGERS Centre for Heart Research, I could only wonder what Mr. Rogers would do to ensure it was clear to all boys, young men and even older ones that it was very, very wrong to beat women. 

Yours.


[Signed Bill S.]

cc:     Edward S. Rogers, Chairman, Toronto Blue Jays
         R. Brace, President, Rogers Media
            M. Shapiro, President and CEO, Toronto Blue Jays

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Friday, January 19, 2018

Mirror, Mirror, Going from My Wall to HIS Tent

The Bronze Laver
Exodus 38:8:
Morever, he made the laver of bronze with its base of bronze, from the mirrors of the serving women who served at the doorway of the tent of meeting.
Thoughts on the Passage
This is the basin that held the water for the ceremonial washing, in accordance with the original instructions of Exodus 30:17-21 where there is no mention of the use of mirrors. Here in chapter 38, we learn that the basin’s material came in part of from polished metal mirrors, owned by the women of the camp. David Guzak postulates that “It is wonderful to think that these women gave up their ability to measure their own physical beauty to make this reservoir. . .. By analogy, it may be said that some [people today] are so focused on looking at themselves that they fail to look to Jesus. It is always time to surrender such a mirror to Jesus.”

He says, “one may say that believers experience the washing of water by the Word (Ephesians 5:26), and that the Word of God is like a mirror (James 1;22-25).

Guzak then goes on to quote others who have offered analogies on this verse. For example, a certain Morgan is said to have written, “It is in the beauty of holiness men must worship, and by the surrender of everything of the flesh.”

Another commentator by the name of Trapp adds, “Let those who view themselves oft in their looking-glasses take his counsel who said, ‘Art thou fair? Be not like an Egyptian temple, varnish without and vermin within. Art thou foul? Let they soul be like a rich pearl in a rude shell.’”
From the text, we learn that there seemed to be a group of women in Israel who served God by regularly gathering to help the priests and the work of the Tabernacle. We see this in practice even today in many of our Protestant churches.  I have also witnessed it in the Greek Orthodox religion.
Guzak says the verb used here and translated ‘minister’ is rare and interesting. It is used in only one other place to refer to women in the service of the sanctuary (see I Samuel 2:22). He says quoting Cole, it really means “’organized in bands for war’, but it is used of ordinary Levitical service (see Numbers 4:23).”

Of course, when we read the I Samuel reference, we can see that all good things, including those intended for God’s service, can be misused. Hopefully, this was not the case at the time of the construction of the Tabernacle.

Robert Jamieson adds to our knowledge by saying, “It was customary for the Egyptian women to carry mirrors with them to the temples; and whether by taking the looking glasses of the Hebrew women Moses designed to put it out of their power to follow a similar practice at the Tabernacle, or whether the supply of brass from other sources in the camp was exhausted, it is interesting to learn how zealously and to a vast extent they surrendered those valued accompaniments of the female [toiletries]”.

Guzak also quotes Hengstenberg who suggests that these women “at the door” were not priestesses but women of pious character and influence, who frequented the courts of the sacred building (see Luke 2:37), and whose parting with their mirrors, like the cutting the hair of the Nazarites, was their renouncing the world for a season.”

Matthew Henry takes us one step further in his commentary on this verse. He suggests this laver holding the water for the priests to wash in when they went in to minister signifies, “the provision that is made in the gospel of Christ for the cleansing of our souls from the moral pollution of sin by the merit and grace of Christ, that we may be fit to serve the holy God in holy duties.” And thus, he says, the refence to the “looking-glasses” or mirrors of the women.

Henry analyzes the whole occasion of the women parting with their finest mirrors. Some women may admire their own beauty, are in love with their own shadow, and make the putting on of apparel their chief adorning by which they value and recommend themselves (do we know any such people – for I daresay, males could also easily be like this – in Hollywood and elsewhere) – these people Henry says can but ill spare their looking-glasses. And then he adds, “yet these women (in our text) offered them to God.”

He goes on to suggest two possible reasons as to why:

1.     In token of their repentance for the former abuse of them (the mirrors), to the support of their pride and vanity; now that they were convinced of their folly, and had devoted themselves to the service of God at the door of the Tabernacle, they thus threw away that which, though lawful and useful in itself, yet had been an occasion of sin to them. Thus Mary Magdalene, who had been a sinner, when she became a penitent wiped Christ’s feet with her hair.  Or,
2.     In token of their great zeal for the work of the Tabernacle; rather than the workmen should want brass, or not have of the best, they would part with their mirrors, though they could not do well without them. God’s service and glory must always be preferred by us before any satisfactions or accommodations of our own. Let us never complain of the want of that which we may honor God by parting with.

Henry suggests that the mirrors were either joined together or molten down and cast anew. But his guess is that the basin was so brightly burnished that the sides of it still served for mirrors, “that the priests, when they came to wash, might there see their faces, and so discover the spots, to wash them clean.”

He goes on to say, “Note, in the washing of repentance, there is need of the looking-glass of self-examination. The Word of God is a glass, in which we may see our own faces (see James 1:23); and with it we must compare our own hearts and lives, that, finding out our blemishes, we may wash with particular sorrow, and application of the blood of Christ to our souls. Usually the more particular we are in the confession of sin the more comfort we have in the sense of the pardon.”


Isn’t it amazing how much we can squeeze out of one verse of Scripture?  The gems are always there for us if we want to dig.  The bottom line for us is this – God first, our ‘image’ last.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.