Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts

Monday, May 21, 2018

God’s Design Law of Love Changes One’s Major Tenets

The God-Shaped Heart: How Correctly Understanding God’s Love Transfoms Us Author: Timothy R. Jennings, MD
Publisher:Baker Books, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2017


In some respects, this is the sequel to the author’s The God-Shaped Brain: How Changing Your View of God Transforms Your Life, which dealt with our brains, anatomy, and God. This time, he shows how our being wired to love is a result of our being created in God’s image – and thus, love gives us a great insight into God’s character, His true identity, and His plans for mankind. Once again, most interesting reading.
His opening premise is that Christianity has been marred, nay, seriously injured, by its focus on fear and punishment of those who don’t buy into it, lock, stock, and barrel. And just like his previous book, Jennings’ arguments and claims are based on solid interpretations of Scripture and supported with counselling examples from his counselling practice. You will find both most stimulating.
No one would argue with Jennings when he postulates that there is power in love. But if so, he asks, where is it?  What’s obstructing it in the lives of Christians? And thus, begins the pilgrimage to find out.
His journey leads him to contest that “the most distressing problem in Christianity is distorted ideas about God.” And to investigate this idea, he takes us to the “heart” – not that physical organ which pumps blood throughout the body, but rather “one’s core self, the inmost secret self, the place where one’s true desires, affections, longings, beliefs, and identity reside – the core elements of one’s individuality. It is our character, composed of all those elements, that make us the individuals we are.” And it is the brain that is the platform on which that ‘heart’ (our character) operates.
Decisions are made by the ‘mind’ which depends on the information it receives from the brain.  And then based on that, Jennings has us consider spiritual warfare from a different perspective.
For me, the highlight of the book is the author’s identification, explanation, and demonstration of the “Seven Levels of Moral Decision-Making”.  This is worth the price of the book itself. Master that and you can then start to consider what level people you know, including yourself, operate at. You’ll be very surprised.  He explains why rules and laws are no longer necessary when living at level five and above.
He does a great job of identifying a multitude of theological positions held by many segments of the Christian Body which we have interpreted and held too, in a way, which communicates the “infection of imposed law, with its false ideas that God is the problem that needs fixing.”
Of course, taking such ideas (that God’s ‘design law’ is all about ‘love’) to their ultimate conclusions, requires readers to challenge its application to some very controversial subjects.  Jennings beats us to the draw and voluntarily does that himself.  He deals with topics such as justice, hell, spousal abuse, worship, divorce, baptism, and more. He saves a lot of his disdain about how church leadership today has morphed into being protectors of the institution, rather doing what they can to help lead people to salvation. (That’s a most interesting and challenging chapter.) In another chapter, he explains how we might utilize the truth about God in our thinking with respect to homosexuality, complete with some very clearly described scientific explanations.
He provides some good advice as to why those of us in the church as well as non-believers are so willing to believe the various lies about God. He then identifies some of the ways to overcome that.
In his concluding chapter, Jennings addresses the issue of God’s judgment. It’s a most informative treatise of the subject. And in his Appendix A, he gives us a “Summary of God’s Design Laws”.
The book challenges our own thinking, attitude, and thus, behavior towards those in our personal relationships, in our church, in the Body, and the world as a whole. It deals with the present as well as the future. Like me, you may not always agree, one hundred percent with where Dr. Jennings ends up on some issues. Still, you will find the book most helpful in informing you of alternatives. And it just make you more like Jesus and perhaps even more useful to Him. 
-->
·     Ken B. Godevenos, President, Accord Resolutions Services Inc., Toronto, Ontario, May 21, 2018, www.accordconsulting.com

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Friday, February 16, 2018

It's Easy to say "I Am a Sinner." Much Harder to say, "This is How I have Sinned."

Telling the Truth and Keeping Promises
Leviticus 5:1-13:
‘Now if a person sins after he hears a public adjuration to testify when he is a witness, whether he has seen or otherwise known, if he does not tell it, then he will bear his guilt. 
Or if a person touches any unclean thing, whether a carcass of an unclean beast or the carcass of unclean cattle or a carcass of unclean swarming things, though it is hidden from him and he is unclean, then he will be guilty.
Or if he touches human uncleanness, of whatever sort his uncleanness may be with which he becomes unclean, and it is hidden from him, and then he comes to know it, he will be guilty. 
Or if a person swears thoughtlessly with his lips to do evil or to do good, in whatever matter a man may speak thoughtlessly with an oath, and it is hidden from him, and then he comes to know it, he will be guilty in one of these. 
So it shall be when he becomes guilty in one of these, that he shall confess that in which he has sinned. 
He shall also bring his guilt offering to the Lord for his sin which he has committed, a female from the flock, a lamb or a goat as a sin offering. So the priest shall make atonement on his behalf for his sin.
‘But if he cannot afford a lamb, then he shall bring to the Lord his guilt offering for that in which he has sinned, two turtledoves or two young pigeons, one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. 
He shall bring them to the priest, who shall offer first that which is for the sin offering and shall nip its head at the front of its neck, but he shall not sever it. 
He shall also sprinkle some of the blood of the sin offering on the side of the altar, while the rest of the blood shall be drained out at the base of the altar: it is a sin offering. 
10 The second he shall then prepare as a burnt offering according to the ordinance. So the priest shall make atonement on his behalf for his sin which he has committed, and it will be forgiven him.
11 ‘But if his means are insufficient for two turtledoves or two young pigeons, then for his offering for that which he has sinned, he shall bring the tenth of an ephah of fine flour for a sin offering; he shall not put oil on it or place incense on it, for it is a sin offering.
12 He shall bring it to the priest, and the priest shall take his handful of it as its memorial portion and offer it up in smoke on the altar, [i]with the offerings of the Lord by fire: it is a sin offering. 
13 So the priest shall make atonement for him concerning his sin which he has [j]committed from one of these, and it will be forgiven him; then the rest shall become the priest’s, like the grain offering.’”

Thoughts on the Passage

It would be prudent for us to stop here for a moment and try to get a better orientation to where we are in the book of Leviticus, as things can start to get quite complex.

Let me give you a high level perspective of the book:

·      Part One (the first 17 chapters) describe the Laws of Acceptable APPROACH to God or Sacrifice
·      Part Two (the last 17 chapters) describe the Laws of Acceptable WALK with God or Sanctification

Now let us look closer at Part One.
·      Part One
o   In chapters 1 to 3, we have described for us the Laws of Approach to God when a person is IN FELLOWSHIP
§  The Burnt Offering – 1:1 –1:17
§  The Meal Offering – 2:1–2:16
§  The Peace Offering – 3:1–3:17,   and that is followed by
o   In chapters 4:1 – 6:7, a description for us of the Laws of Approach to God when a peson is OUT OF FELLOWSHIP
§  The Sin Offering – 4:1—5:13
§  The Guilt Offering – 5:14—6:7
o   And that is then followed by a section on the laws for Administering these Five Offerings (6:8—7:38)

Right now, we are studying the highlighted portion above – The Sin Offering for when out of fellowship with God.

Chuck Smith boils guilt down to being aware or being made aware of you doing something that is wrong in God’s eyes.  And when that happens, we need to confess such sin. And a sacrifice without confession is not sufficient. God can’t deal with sin in our life as long as we do not confess it, or even if we still want to hold on to parts of it or make excuses for it.  Our confessed sin allows God to be faithful and forgive us and cleanse us from it.

Verses one to five talk about the need for confession of the sin. Then the sin offering can be offered, and it requires either a female lamb, or a kid goat. And if neither of those are affordable, then two turtle doves, or two young pigeons.

David Guzik focuses on the need for the Israelites to be truthful witnesses to what they see, with respect to others committing sin or crime. With all the FakeNews going around these days, people have lost the sense of what truth is and why it is important.

For Guzik, the text seems to indicate that it isn’t enough to merely not tell lies. God also requires His people to make the truth known. Several thoughts come to my mind when I read this.  First, while we can claim much of the Torah’s Laws are not applicable to us today, there are many principles on which those laws are based that do apply to us today. This is just one example.

Secondly, what does this principle say to us about ‘speaking up’ when we know wrong has been done?  I believe there is a role for Christians in this today – be it in the injustices that take place globally, or nationally, or locally, or in our churches, or in our families. But we do it with love.
Matthew Henry says that we need to tell the truth in such cases, even though we may fear offending a friend or possibly an enemy who may harm us. Not doing so, he says, makes us a partner with the sinner.

And thirdly, we need to be aware that the world has abandoned the idea of “telling the truth” being an absolute value. You see people lying all the time – even in court or elsewhere under oath and then getting caught and asking for forgiveness, really regretting only that they got caught.
And the text says, if we don’t tell the truth that is hidden, we ourselves bear the guilt. One commentator (Harris) says, “In Israel all the people were to be involved in seeing that justice was done. Not to witness was a sin.”  What a difference it would make to the church as a whole, and thus to the world, if we all believed that today.  So many Christians would “rather just not be involved”.  If so, there is no way of getting around it – they bear the guilt, the Bible says. And Guzik applies that to our giving witness of our own relationship with Jesus Christ.  Don’t share Him when the opportunity arises, and you risk bearing the guilt associated with that.

The cleansing associated with the sin offering was also necessary when someone in the camp became ceremoniously unclean by touching anything that was unclean (either a carcass of an unclean animal or any human uncleanness). This was particularly important before someone was to come near or to enter the court of the Tabernacle.

Verse 4 addresses something that I think should be read over and over.  Guzik says it implies that “A careless promise was still a promise before the Lord and had to be observed. If the promise was not kept it had to be atoned for by a sin offering. . .. When we are aware of our broken vows we must repent of them.” Examples include saying we will pursue more time in prayer; more prayer for others; more time in the word; more unashamed witnessing; more faithful giving; more patience with our children; more love to our spouse; and more purity in mind, word, and deed.  Time to confess.
While this may seem like it refers to promises we make to God and then break (which are done often by all of us, especially when we are going through difficult times), I believe it also applies to when we break the promises we make to others – for I do not believe God would have us treat our fellow Christians and others differently.  And surprisingly, and sadly, I have found in my long career and association with both business people and clergy, that it is the clergy that often fail miserably in this regard.  They fail to keep their promises and are many times too proud to even admit it.
Vows and promises are good and sometimes a sign that the Holy Spirit is working in us. But if not kept, they become a sin in need of confession and repentance.  Henry says this also applies to “rash swearing” or rash promises – especially a promise that would cause the promiser to break a law or to otherwise sin. By not doing so, he is discharged from the sin he would have committed, but he still needs to atone for the broken promise that he made.

Verse 5 indicates that the confession needs to happen at the time the person realizes his guilt. That’s when he confesses, meaning he agrees with God that the action taken was a sin or thus wrong.
Guzik also raises the question many of us may not have thought of before. He says, “When we see how strongly the principle of atonement by sacrifice is emphasized in the Old Testament, many people wonder why the Jewish people today no longer make sacrifice. The answer is that they believe their good works will substitute for animal sacrifice.”  Harris backs him up by saying, “Indeed, when the second temple fell, the rabbis, denied an altar in Jerusalem, came to the conclusion that gifts and prayers were as acceptable as animal sacrifice.” While that is a possibility, I would rather hear from a Jew on this issue. So, I turned to http://www.jewfaq.org/qorbanot.htm this site and found out that Guzik is on the right track. The only exception being that Orthodox Jews would like to see this practice return.

Matthew Henry adds more insights to this passage.  First that based on verses 5 and 6, the offering could not occur until the confession was made. Second, that the confession must be specific (see the end of verse 5). That is backed up in the case of Achan described later in Joshua 7:20 who said, “I have sinned against the Lord…and this is what I did.”


It is easy for someone to say, “I am a sinner.” It is much harder to say, “This is how I have sinned.”  And yet that’s what God requires of us all.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

The Truth May Be Lost In Its Delivery


The Real Bible Truth: A Great Deception Has Been Wrought On The World
Author: Ernie Hasler
Published by: self-published, Charleston, S.C., 2016

Author Ernie Hasler has searched for biblical truths in many places and he believes the Bible has been corrupted in some very significant ways. Hasler shows us, to the best of his ability, that our main religions – Judaism and Christianity – have been wrong about the origin of the symbol of the cross, the name of the Creator, and more.
He presents his readers with some interesting statements and positions. A lot of them make sense. He seldom, however, backs up his claims with appropriate sources or research which frustrates any reader that may have different views. For example, how does he know the early versions of The Tanakh (original Hebrew writings of the O.T.) were written in Paleo-Hebrew beginning from the 5th BCE onward? Or that the council of Laodicia passed a law requiring Christians to not become “Judaized by resting on Saturday”? Or that the introduction of the word ‘Lord’ was really a substitute for ‘Ba’al’? He does the same with the dating of the ‘Tetragrammaton’, the Hebrew name of God transliterated in four letters as YHWH or JHVH and articulated as Yahweh or Jehovah. Perhaps all believable claims but certainly not substantiated with any hard evidence.
Where he does give a source of information, it often is one that is questionable as in the Dictionary of Christian Lore and Legend from which he states that the name of Yeshua has been replaced by the names of G-zeus (Jesus), and (Ea-zeus), which are absolutely pagan in origin, according to Hasler. He quotes the Catholic Encyclopedia, volume and page, when he introduces the idea of a great deception we have all been exposed to concerning the existence of Christianity in the time of Constantine as well as his ‘conversion’ and ‘baptism’.
His material is well worth being aware of, but it could benefit from some serious editing and more verification. What may be intuitive to Hasler isn’t necessarily intuitive for others. Perhaps the greatest contribution that Ernie Hasler has made though in this mini-volume (the entire book is only 81 pages from cover to cover) is the last 31 pages in which he lists and numbers all 613 commandments found in the Old Testament books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, complete with description and Scripture chapter and verse.
Hasler has written another book and in its title is the word “Conspiracy” which is missing from this one. There’s no doubt though that he sees much of the corruption he claims is present in Scripture to be just that – a conspiracy. What this book will do for an avid Bible student is allow him/her to take Hasler’s claims (for they are intriguing) and do his/her own more academic study and research in order to ascertain the “truth” in a more convincing manner, be it what Hasler claims or otherwise.

* Ken B. Godevenos, President, Accord Resolutions Services Inc., Toronto, Ontario, September 24, 2016. www.accordconsulting.com


It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.