Showing posts with label Rebellion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rebellion. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

Have you ever been part of a rebellion? In your family, work, church, city, or country?

Numbers 16:1-14 The Rebellion of Korah
Day 63. We made it to nine weeks of “please stay at home” advice, and in many cases, required compliance. That’s equivalent to a whole summer’s vacation for students. Got word yesterday that the U.S. and Canada are negotiating a further extension to the ban on non-essential cross-border travel. That means we can’t go see our family in the south. The two camps on the seriousness of the virus, the best way to get over it, and even on what caused it and who knew what when continue to fight each other in every way they can think of.  Schools in Ontario were officially declared closed until the fall, so parents have another three and a half months to ‘enjoy’ their children at home, or not. We press on studying God’s Word and finding new gems every day, even in the otherwise unexciting book of Numbers. Read on.
The Passage
16 Now Korah the son of Izhar, the son of Kohath, the son of Levi, with Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab, and On the son of Peleth, sons of Reuben, took action, 2 and they rose up before Moses, [a]together with some of the sons of Israel, two hundred and fifty leaders of the congregation, [b]chosen in the assembly, men of renown. 3 They assembled together against Moses and Aaron, and said to them, “[c]You have gone far enough, for all the congregation are holy, every one of them, and the Lord is in their midst; so why do you exalt yourselves above the assembly of the Lord?”
4 When Moses heard this, he fell on his face; 5 and he spoke to Korah and all his company, saying, “Tomorrow morning the Lord will show who is His, and who is holy, and will bring him near to Himself; even the one whom He will choose, He will bring near to Himself. 6 Do this: take censers for yourselves, Korah and all [d]your company, 7 and put fire in them, and lay incense upon them in the presence of the Lord tomorrow; and the man whom the Lord chooses shall be the one who is holy. [e]You have gone far enough, you sons of Levi!”
8 Then Moses said to Korah, “Hear now, you sons of Levi, 9 is it [f]not enough for you that the God of Israel has separated you from the rest of the congregation of Israel, to bring you near to Himself, to do the service of the tabernacle of the Lord, and to stand before the congregation to minister to them; 10 and that He has brought you near, Korah, and all your brothers, sons of Levi, with you? And are you seeking for the priesthood also?11 Therefore you and all your company are gathered together against the Lord; but as for Aaron, [g]who is he that you grumble against him?”
12 Then Moses sent [h]a summons to Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab; but they said, “We will not come up. 13 Is it [i]not enough that you have brought us up out of a land flowing with milk and honey to have us die in the wilderness, but you would also lord it over us? 14 Indeed, you have not brought us into a land flowing with milk and honey, nor have you given us an inheritance of fields and vineyards. Would you [j]put out the eyes of [k]these men? We will not come up!”

Footnotes

  1. Numbers 16:2 Lit and men from
  2. Numbers 16:2 Lit called ones of
  3. Numbers 16:3 Lit It is much for you
  4. Numbers 16:6 Lit his
  5. Numbers 16:7 Lit It is much for you
  6. Numbers 16:9 Or too little for you
  7. Numbers 16:11 Lit what
  8. Numbers 16:12 Lit to call
  9. Numbers 16:13 Lit a little thing
  10. Numbers 16:14 Lit bore out
  11. Numbers 16:14 Lit those

Thoughts on the Passage
We note that the rebellious group was not just Korah (from the tribe of the Levites), but he was joined by Dathan and Abiram (from the tribe of Reuben). But these three were able to incite 250 others, all ‘leaders’ of the people to rise up and assemble against Moses and Aaron. It is amazing how just one disgruntled person, can convince two others, and how three can convince 250 other men who were ‘renown’ amongst the people to act in opposition to leaders appointed by God. [By the way, Korah is also mentioned in the book of Jude, verse 11. David Guzik points out that Both Moses and Korah were descended from Kohath, but by different sons (Moses through Amram {Numbers 26:58-59}, and Korah through Izhar). Also as Matthew Henry points out, On is mentioned (verse 1) as one of the heads of the faction, but never after in the whole story, either because, as some think, he repented and left them, or because he did not make himself so remarkable as Dathan and Abiram did.]
Henry further notes that “the Kohathites encamped on the same side of the tabernacle that the Reubenites did, which perhaps gave Korah an opportunity of drawing them in, whence the Jews say, ‘Woe to the wicked man, and woe to his neighbor, who is in danger of being infected by him.’”
They told Moses and Aaron that they had over-extended their power and authority, and it appears their claim on being ‘holy’ and that “God was with them alone”. The rebels felt every single person in the congregation was holy and that God was with them too. So they weren’t pleased with the idea that Moses and Aaron were ‘exalting’ themselves above them. This accusation of pride and exclusionary leadership according to David Guzik was made in public, playing to the audience of 250 leaders. Rebels often play to an audience. In fact, we see it daily from our politicians, especially those in opposition to an elected administration. We note, like Guzik, that with these 250 leaders, Korah himself was, from a human perspective, successful. How often do we get duped by a humanly successful leader when in fact that leader may take us down the wrong path? Once again, the Jim Jones Jonestown, Guyana, massacre in 1978, comes to mind.
[The rebels also felt there was too much nepotism going on – you know, Moses getting the cushy job for Aaron his brother, and Miriam, his sister, having a special role with respect to the tabernacle. People grumble the same way today when they see a ‘family’ doing well. And I have no problem with that as long as appointed family members have the ability to do the job they need to do well.]
My guess is that when Moses fell on his face in verse 4, he prayed.  He always prayed when faced with opposition or challenges like this one. We don’t know how long of a break there was between verse 4 and verse 5 when he replies to his accusers.
And now comes the predecessor of what I call the “fire from heaven Elijah test” as we read in I Kings 18. Moses tells Korah and his gang that “in the morning God will show who is His”. In the morning God would show whom He draws to Himself; whom He chooses. Robert Jamieson reminds us that “in the morning” is the usual time of meeting in the East for the settlement of public affairs.
Moses must have been very sure of himself to acclaim this future act of God’s. But then again we must remember that Moses had seen the power of God over and over again in Egypt and so far in the wilderness. We also know that God chose Moses to complete a very special assignment and He gave Moses the right to speak for Him, telling the Isralites long ago (in Exodus 3) that He Who calls Himself the “I AM WHO I AM” has sent him (Moses) to them. As I read these thoughts now, I am reminded of the fact that Moses was “sent by God” to the people to deliver them from Egypt and their slavery. So likewise, Jesus was sent by God to His people years later to deliver us from our sin and slavery to it. Moses was no ordinary man; he could be sure of God’s support.
And with that confidence he tells the rebels to take censers (a container, usually covered, in which incense is burned, especially during religious services), fill them with incense, and set them on fire before the Lord, and see what happens. And Moses ends his little speech with an admonition to Korah and company, especially since Korah was a Levite. They had, in the words of Moses, “gone too far”. Perhaps he was worried that he could no longer expect God to forgive them again. They had already cashed in their last chip. I have a relative who feels like that – they feel they have sinned so often and so badly, that there is no way God can forgive them. That must be a terrible feeling. Unfortunately, some who feel that way also use it as an excuse never to come to grips with the issue of their relationship with God. All the rest of us can do is continue to pray.
[As I was doing this study, my wife just informed me about how miraculously God worked in the lives a couple we were praying for. The expression used was the sincere attempt at a change came “out of the blue”. And God does indeed work out of the blue. Moses knew that.  We believe it. Let’s keep looking for God to work “out of the blue” for us and for those we are praying for.]
Moses now more directly addresses Korah and those that were from the tribe of Reuben. How could these men not consider it sufficient that God Himself had separated them from the other tribes, had drawn them close to Him, to serve the Lord in the tabernacle, and to minister before the people? The Kohathites had, according to Guzik, the most exalted duty among the Levites; their charge was to carry the most holy things of the temple, after Aaron and his sons had covered them with the specially prepared coverings (Numbers 4:15). Moses tried to expose a possible desire of Korah himself and those close to him – the attainment of the office of ‘priests’ not just helpers in the Tent.
If that was the case, Moses indicates he could see why they are grumbling against the Lord, and perhaps even himself.  But what did these people have to grumble against Aaron himself?  There was no response that we know of. I love what Guzik says about Korah and how he would have led Israel as compared to Moses:
It is unbelievably easy for the Korahs of this world to sit back and say, "If I was leading the nation at Kadesh Barnea, I would have done thus and so." But Korah was not leading the nation, and men of his type rarely do. God rarely puts the Monday-morning quarterbacks, the backseat drivers, in positions of real leadership - except as a chastisement, to show them just how difficult leadership really is - and that perfect leadership, like perfect anything, is impossible.
Can we remember that as we watch rebels today? Can we remember that as we watch world politicians today? Can we apply that to our own leadership or rebellious thoughts, words, and actions today?
After that, Moses calls for the two leaders in the gang from Reuben’s tribe, Dathan and Abiram. But they refuse to go and see Moses, complaining further that not only had Moses taken them from “a land flowing with milk and honey” (boy, was Egypt ever glorified in their minds – remember, memory makes the mind murky, it colors the past), and now he was “lording it over them”. They felt cheated out of the promised land, the real land flowing with milk and honey and out of their inheritance of fields and vineyards. They accused Moses of wanting to “bore out” their eyes. So they refused to go and see him. Wow.
This was a total defiance of Moses’ authority and leadership. They would only follow and listen to God. What they missed was the very fact that Moses was God’s appointee. It would have been one thing if Moses had sinned. It is another thing to make up accusations against God’s anointed and appointed. In cases like this we must always check the hearts – both of the accusers and the accused. And then speak up – either in support of those who rightly judge or in defense of the one being falsely accused (as in this case). Our silence is not only a weakness, but it may be a sin.

In our next study, we will see how Moses and God both react. Hope you caught all the lesson gems that God gave us here through this rebellion.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Monday, July 06, 2015

A Process by which to Determine if a Specific Promise of God's is Meant for You


Who is the Angel God Sends To Guard the Israelites On Their Way?
Exodus 23:20-21: “Behold, I am going to send an angel before you to guard you along the way, and to bring you into the place which I have prepared. Be on your guard before him and obey his voice; do not be rebellious toward him, for he will not pardon your transgression, since My name is in him.”
I do not know about you, but whenever I read a promise of God’s like this one, the Enemy starts working on me: “This is not for you; it’s only meant for the people of Israel at that time. So don’t count on it.” There are several courses of action one could take with that kind of taunting.
1.     You can disregard the taunting, claim the promise, while merrily singing the old chorus you learned as a child, “Every promise in the book is mine!”
2.     You can believe the taunting, never thinking any more about the promise, and go on doing life as you normally do – wondering whether or not you are forced to fend for yourself.
3.     You can agree with some Bible scholars that believe certain promises were made to certain individuals or groups and are not to be taken as being for us, but this will require an investigation as to whether or not this is one of them.
You can weigh the likelihood of any of the three choices being correct or incorrect against your:
a.     Understanding of God based on the rest of Scripture,
b.     Ability to reason it out,
c.     Knowledge of what believers have traditionally believed, and
d.     Personal experience.
Using these four criteria, you can then examine each of the three options:
1.     Disregarding the taunting and claiming the promise may satisfy criteria a., c., and possibly d. above, but b. may present some problems especially as you may tend to agree with the rationale that certainly God makes promises to specific people at specific times and since He was talking to the Israelites in this passage, that may not include me.
2.     Believing the taunting and not claiming the promise, for the Christian, will likely not satisfy criteria a., c., and perhaps d.
3.     Investigating the promise has the potential of satisfying all four criteria – a., b., c., and d.
To take that course of action, i.e. investigating the promise before we can claim it for ourselves, we need to first examine the context of the promise. Was it made to someone or a group as a particular promise for a specific one-time response to an explicit circumstance?  Or is there enough generality in it that could apply to many of us in most aspects of, and during our entire, life? Secondly, we would ask ourselves as to whether or not this promise is in keeping with other parts of Scripture that repeat similar concepts to other believers? Thirdly, does it make sense that God, assuming Him to be what we believe He is, would make this kind of promise to all His children? Fourth, what do other true believers, for the most part, believe? And finally, what is my personal experience with regard to the content of this assurance?
In this particular case, my personal investigation of this promise, leads me to believe that it is one that I can claim.  Keep in mind that the Israelites were going to spend forty years in the desert and God knew that.  This is clearly not a promise in return for a one-time action required on their part – it is to become a way of life for them. There is enough generality in it so as to be applicable to many. For example, it speaks of “guarding us along our way” until He brings us to a place He has “prepared for us” and it speaks to “obedience”, our “rebellion”, and our “pardon from sin”. All of which are spoken of elsewhere in Scripture.
In addition, the promise is in keeping with our understanding of God as we know and believe Him to be. It is a promise that has been widely accepted by many believers.  And finally, for me at least, it is a promise I have seen fulfilled time and time again in my own life, my own experience.
Having hopefully established that, we can look more closely at the promise God is making here.  To begin with, He is “sending” an “angel”. God is the mastermind here. He has delegated this most important task to someone else in which He has great confidence. But this is no ordinary angel but rather one that has God’s name in Him.  It is an angel that must be obeyed.  It is an angle capable of freeing us from our bondage (Egypt for the Israelites) and delivering us to the Promised Land (Canaan for the Israelites and Heaven for us). And this angel has the power to pardon our sins and those of the Israelites. It is no wonder that the majority of biblical commentators agree that this is the Son of God, Jesus Christ.
Jesus was given this task by God His Father and as the Son, God’s name was in Him. This was a real task, not just a make-work project but at the same time, it was a proto-type of what Jesus would do for all mankind.
Our job is to be on our guard before Him and to obey His voice throughout our journey in the wilderness of life.  The entire New Testament tells us how. But the bottom line is this: we are not to rebel against Him, for He will not pardon our transgression.
I hope you can claim this promise with me.  But I also pray you understand its consequences should we fail to claim it and choose to obey.

Thanks for dropping by. Sign up to receive free updates. We bring you relevant information from all sorts of sources. Subscribe for free to this blog or follow us by clicking on the appropriate link in the right side bar. And please share this blog with your friends. Ken Godevenos, Church and Management Consultant, Accord Consulting.  And while you’re here, why not check out some more of our recent blogs shown in the right hand column.  Ken.


It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Friday, November 11, 2011

What On Earth Has Gotten Into Some Amish Rebels?

You would think that if someone in the Amish community, one of the most peaceful in the world, had a beef -- he would simply leave quietly. If he wanted to remain in the religion, he might go off and start his own Amish colony. He would never seek to do harm to those he left behind. But not in this case. This is totally out of character for people in this group. And it's happening often. Take a look.

BBC News - Amish son cuts off father's beard and hair


[Are you looking for a speaker at your church, your club, school, or organization? Ken is available to preach, teach, challenge, and/or motivate. Please contact us.]

Thanks for dropping by. Sign up to receive free updates. We bring you relevant information from all sorts of sources. Subscribe for free to this blog or follow us by clicking on the appropriate link in the right side bar. And please share this blog with your friends. Ken Godevenos, Church and Management Consultant, Accord Consulting. 

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Monday, September 06, 2010

The Marketing of Evil -- Synopsis, Part III - Selling Sex & Rebellion to Your Children


Welcome to number three in a series of blogs providing a synopsis of David Kupelian's book, "The Marketing of Evil", 2005. This segment is on the topic of "Who's Selling Sex & Rebellion to Your Children" -- chapter 3 in David's 'must read' book. Here are just a few of the highlights:

* Kupelian starts the chapter off with an excellent example of peer pressure exerted on his own son. Well worth the read. Many can identify with it. How he handled it is also very special.

* He defines 'hip-hop' as "a multimillion-dollar music industry filled with 'the powerful political and sexual images of rap'". His detailed expose of it is eye-opening.

* He names the corporations that literally send spies to infiltrate young people's social settings to gather intelligence on what they can induce these children to buy next. He exposes MTV and Howard Stern's world for what it truly is, pushing the world of the 'mook' for boys and the 'midriff' for girls. You'll want to check both these terms out with reference to the program "The Merchants of Cool" as found on Google.

* In that same program, Mark Crispen-Miller, a NYU communications professor has this to say about how kids are taught to think of you: "It's part of the official rock world view, it's part of the official advertising world view, that your parents are creeps, teachers are nerds and idiots, authority figures are laughable, nobody can really understand kids except the corporate sponsor" of the shows kids watch (MTV being the leaders). Wow.

* In this chapter, there's a section on the idea of "no limits" especially when it comes to sexual behavior where I learned so much -- stuff I never dreamed of nor wanted to learn about. Find out what "suspension" is all about -- and no it was nothing to do with "school" -- it's a sexual fantasy and more. And then, just when you thought you had it all figured out, you learn about the two ultimate thrills -- splitting your tongue, and wait there's more -- the thrill of living for the chase -- yes, that's right, people who chase the bug. No, not a Volkswagen -- the HIV bug. There are men who spend their lives pursuing getting the HIV virus through the right sexual partners. Kupelian quotes one author who writes, "HIV-infected semen is treated like liquid gold." Motivation, you ask? Well, it's all about doing something thrilling that others see as crazy. Great.

* Kupelian points to a desire or a love with death. For example, self-mutilators are said to pursue their specialty due to one or both of the following: A feeling of mental disintegration, of inability to think, and secondly, "a rage that can't be expressed, or even consciously perceived, toward a powerful figure (or figures) in their life, usually a parent." Got it. It's payback time for us folks. To many, physical pain can be a cure for emotional pain. But wait, there is hope -- at least, hope in understanding this. Read on . . .

* Kupelian suggests that all these pursuits are basically as a result of millions of people who have been "freed" by trauma (drugs, illicit sex, bodily mutilation, and so on) from the pain of their own conscience. Or said another way, he writes, "freed from God and the divine law written deep down in every person's heart. Why? Same reason as always: so they can be their own gods and make up their own rules."

* Now here comes the hope. He writes that parents need to understand this: "Your being any way other than genuinely virtuous -- not perfect, mind you, but honestly and diligently seeking to do the right thing at all times -- will tend to drive your children crazy. Here's how the craziness unfolds. Children deserve and desperately need firmness, patience, fairness, limits, kindness, insight, and a good, non-hypocritical example. In other words, they need genuine parental love and guidance. If they don't get this, they will resent you. Even if you can't see it, even if they can't see it, and deny it, they will resent you for failing to give them real love." That's the first step, but here's what happens with this in mind . . .

* It is that resentment (discussed above) that turns into suppressed rage. "It makes children feel compelled to rebel against you and against all authority out of revenge for your having failed them." Hard words. Everything forbidden looks like a road to freedom. They now embrace what they before avoided in a more innocent time. And all of this usually occurs below the level of consciousness.

* Kupelian does end this chapter with two positive thoughts. The first is, if you still have time, to consider counter-acting all the negative influences with home-schooling, a growing practice around the world and one that is driving secular government educators to try and get the courts to make it illegal. The second positive thought is that even if your kids don't come around, "your honest self-examination and confession as a parent will free you from your own guilts and past sins.

My own thought is that maybe we cannot redeem the entire American or North American culture from its current state, but we may be able to redeem our own children from it, or at the very least, ourselves. I say this because I feel as I look around that those who are baby boomers and younger have much to blame on themselves.

Again, the book is a 'must read'. In the next blog in this series, I'll give you a synopsis of Kupelian's thoughts on the "Multicultural Madness". In the meantime, please share this blog with your friends and do subscribe to free notifications on future blogs from Epistoli.

-- Ken Godevenos, We Inform, so You can do Your thing.

Join others following Ken on Twitter
Check-out AccordConsulting, SCA International, and Human Resources for the Church.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.