Showing posts with label male. Show all posts
Showing posts with label male. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2020

It's hard to see that God's Way is based on Justice, His Promise, and His Love -- but it is.


Numbers Chapter 31: Victory over Midian
Numbers 31:1-54
Day 89 of a recommended “stay at home” policy for our area. But many people are not staying at home.  They go out, some with masks, some without. There is considerable confusion about what works, what doesn’t; what’s open, what isn’t; and what’s mandatory and what isn’t. Welcome to the new order of mass (and mask) muddling. We stay the course, going about our business as best we can. On our daily walks each morning, at a rather fast clip, it is interesting to watch people of all ages clear the way for us, making sure there is no way they will come anywhere within six (but usually to be safe they make it easily 10 or 15) feet away.  Yet the government says we can now meet with ten people at a time without social distancing, and interestingly enough each of us can meet with nine different people each time.  So, where’s the logic in all this?  There isn’t any. But there’s always logic and justice and love in God’s Word, so we continue to study it.  Thanks for joining us.
The Passage
31 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Take full vengeance for the sons of Israel on the Midianites; afterward you will be gathered to your people.” Moses spoke to the people, saying, “Arm men from among you for the war, that they may [a]go against Midian to execute the Lord’s vengeance on Midian. A thousand from each tribe of all the tribes of Israel you shall send to the war.” So there were [b]furnished from the thousands of Israel, a thousand from each tribe, twelve thousand armed for war. Moses sent them, a thousand from each tribe, to the war, and Phinehas the son of Eleazar the priest, to the war with them, and the holy vessels and the trumpets for the alarm in his hand. So they made war against Midian, just as the Lord had commanded Moses, and they killed every male. They killed the kings of Midian along with the rest of their slain: Evi and Rekem and Zur and Hur and Reba, the five kings of Midian; they also killed Balaam the son of Beor with the sword. The sons of Israel captured the women of Midian and their little ones; and all their cattle and all their flocks and all their goods they plundered. 10 Then they burned all their cities where they lived and all their camps with fire. 11 They took all the spoil and all the prey, both of man and of beast. 12 They brought the captives and the prey and the spoil to Moses, and to Eleazar the priest and to the congregation of the sons of Israel, to the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by the Jordan opposite Jericho.
13 Moses and Eleazar the priest and all the leaders of the congregation went out to meet them outside the camp. 14 Moses was angry with the officers of the army, the captains of thousands and the captains of hundreds, who had come from service in the war. 15 And Moses said to them, “Have you [c]spared all the women? 16 Behold, these [d]caused the sons of Israel, through the [e]counsel of Balaam, to [f]trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, so the plague was among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man [g]intimately. 18 But all the [h]girls who have not known man [i]intimately, [j]spare for yourselves. 19 And you, camp outside the camp seven days; whoever has killed any person and whoever has touched any slain, purify yourselves, you and your captives, on the third day and on the seventh day. 20 You shall purify for yourselves every garment and every article of [k]leather and all the work of goats’ hair, and all articles of wood.”
21 Then Eleazar the priest said to the men of war who had gone to battle, “This is the statute of the law which the Lord has commanded Moses: 22 only the gold and the silver, the bronze, the iron, the tin and the lead, 23 everything that can stand the fire, you shall pass through the fire, and it shall be clean, but it shall be purified with water for impurity. But whatever cannot stand the fire you shall pass through the water. 24 And you shall wash your clothes on the seventh day and be clean, and afterward you may enter the camp.”
Verses 25-54 describe how the spoils taken from the slaughter were divided.

Footnotes

  1. Numbers 31:3 Lit be
  2. Numbers 31:5 Lit delivered
  3. Numbers 31:15 Lit let...live
  4. Numbers 31:16 Lit were to
  5. Numbers 31:16 Lit word
  6. Numbers 31:16 Possibly defect from the Lord
  7. Numbers 31:17 Lit by lying with a man
  8. Numbers 31:18 Lit female children
  9. Numbers 31:18 Lit by lying with a man
  10. Numbers 31:18 Lit keep alive
  11. Numbers 31:20 Or skin
Thoughts on the Passage
I must confess that this is one of the most difficult passages for me to read and/or study. The reasons are many as you’ll see in my comments below. It is a history of a “holy war” and it contains all the atrocities of war.
To begin with we have God’s instructions to Moses to “Take full vengeance for the sons of Israel on the Midianites”. I don’t know what God may have had in mind when He used that phrase “full vengeance”. But it sure sounds like “no holds barred” to me. Doesn’t sound like a loving God, many would claim. We must remember that God is also “just” and we will understand His reasoning for that instruction as we study the chapter further.
Secondly, in verse 2, we note that God instructed Moses to “go against Midian (in order) to execute the Lord’s vengeance on Midian.” This was God’s war, no one else’s. As difficult as it may be for us to accept that, we must again look for God’s reasons for doing so. And we’ll see that His reason made sense to a Holy God and thus should make sense to us, His people. We also know that because it was His war, victory was guaranteed. [And note also at the end of the chapter we learn that in this case success was total – not a single soldier of Israel’s was lost in the battle.] Vengeance when undertaken by God is a positive and necessary thing. It becomes evil when we undertake it. It is similar to the idea that we are not to take the law into our own hands in our society today.
Thirdly, God is telling Moses to lead his people in this war with the Midianites, after which Moses would “gathered to (his) people”, although this was not an “immediately afterwards”. This isn’t, “Hey Moses, just do this one more thing in your role as leader, and then you can retire.” No, it’s “do this one more thing and then you will die.” What kind of motivation was that? How did Moses do it? Well, the answer is twofold. First, we know the character of Moses and his commitment to obeying God and having complete trust in Him. Second, he realized that being gathered to his people was not such a bad deal under the circumstances after all. What a role model he is for us. He knew his role; he knew when he had accomplished his role; and he understand that God’s fairness and His word had to be fulfilled.
We also note in verse 6 that those that went to war included Phinehas the son of Eleazar the high priest (after the death of Aaron) and his priests. And they took with them the holy vessels and the trumpets with which to sound the alarm for the troops.
The Israelites engaged the Midianites and killed every male, including the five kings of Midian, and Balaam (which we remember was sought by Balak to curse Israel). He did not get his wish to die like the righteous because he wasn’t righteous. He was greedy and so he died with the unrighteous.
Now what the army of Israel did was capture the women and children, and all the cattle and flocks, and also plundered their possessions. They then burned everything to the ground. And they return home with their captives and the spoils. This was all in accordance with the custom of the day with respect to battles.
Matthew Henry points out that their triumphant march home was met with great respect when even the very aged Moses walked out of the camp to meet them. But then. . .
When Moses saw them, he was angry with their officers, and here comes another hard part, because he saw that they had “spared all the women”. Henry says he may well have been moved with a holy indignation at the sight of them, for you remember the law in the case of whoredom was that the adulterer and the adulteress should surely be put to death. God had taken care of the former, now He wanted the latter to be taken care of. They were supposed to have died as well. When God says, “full vengeance”, He means “full vengeance”. And then Moses gives us God’s reasoning for all of this when he says in verse 16 that it was the women who caused the sons of Israel, “through the counsel of Balaam”, to sin against the Lord which in turn caused the plague among the Israelites. God had His reasons for what He wanted done and Moses knew it.
Also, as Matthew Henry reminds us, God had already taken vengeance on his own people for being involved in this whole mess with the Midianites – remember the plague. Now He had to complete His exercise of justice on those that caused the problem. Furthermore, it is possible that God may have wanted to allow Moses the privilege of seeing revenge on the Midianites as he had been very angry at what had happened earlier as a result.
According to David Guzik, Moses may have also been angry “because the children of Israel failed to see the great danger of sexual immorality and idolatry posed by these women who before led the men of Israel into these exact sins.
So therefore, Moses now instructs the officers to kill all the male children they took captive and every woman who is not a virgin. And he offered them the virgins for themselves. Wow. They never taught me all this in Sunday School. What was Moses doing here? Why on earth would he give the Israelite men ungodly women to sleep with? Or was it that these women were simply to become their slaves? And why would kill young males? On this question, Guzik writes: “This was harsh, but done with the understanding that in that ancient culture, the boys would have grown into men with the solemn responsibility to avenge their father's death and to perpetuate Midianite culture - which in itself was anti-God.” And Robert Jamieson indicates that God had intended this war to be a war of extermination of an evil idolatrous people.
We stop here for a moment, because no doubt this action of God’s through the Israelites is a very hard concept for us. Chuck Smith suggests we need to understand a little about the culture of these and especially their religious practices. Marriage vows meant nothing. Bestiality was practiced. Human and especially child sacrifices to their gods were the order of the day. And God didn’t want them to pollute His children, the Israelites.
Of course, anyone who had killed any person or touched the dead were deemed unclean and had to remain outside the camp for seven days, and they along with their captives had to be purified on the third and seventh days of the isolation. And that included every piece of clothing as well as other articles (verse 20).
Verses 21-24 explain how Eleazar had them put everything through the fire, and only the precious metals that could withstand the fire would be considered ‘clean’.
In the section that describes how the spoils were to be divided, we note that everyone who went out to war was to get their share (50%) and the other half would be shared among the rest of the congregation. But a tax was to be levied on those things and given to Eleazar as an offering to the Lord (one for every 500 from the warriors and one for every 50 from the congregation’s half). In total there were over 800,000 animals that were captured (verses 32-34) and 32,000 virgins (verse 35).  And if I have this right, one wonders what the priest and his family would do with 352 virgins (32 from the warriors’ 16,000; and 320 for the congregation’s 16,000). No answer is provided to my knowledge.
The chapter ends with all the men who went out to war bringing to Moses and the Eleazar all the gold that they had taken in their plundering. And they did this because they were so thankful that not one single Israelite was lost in this battle.
What are the lessons we need to learn from this passage today?
First, what wars are we fighting? Are they ours or are they God’s? If they are ours, there is no guarantee we’ll win. If they are God’s, there is no way He’ll lose.
Second, that God’s way may not always seem right to us, but there is always validity in it. It is always based on one or more of three of His attributes as the Almighty Creator Father God: a) His execution of justice, b) His keeping of His word, and c) His love for His children. What God was doing here was exercising all three – He wanted justice for the sins of the Midianites, He kept His word as to what would happen, and He did it because He loved His people and wanted to protect them for the future. We can’t miss this.
And thirdly, this whole scenario is a foreshadowing, in my opinion, of exactly how God will deal with the world as a whole in due time. Justice will be served, His promises will be kept, and His people will be saved. That’s our God.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Monday, January 13, 2020

If Any Passage of Scripture Could Be Arguably Sexist, This Might Be It. Or Perhaps Not.

Laws Concerning Childbirth
Leviticus 12
Leviticus 12:1- 8
1Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Speak to the sons of Israel, saying:
‘When a woman gives birth and bears a male child, then she shall be unclean for seven days, as in the days of her menstruation she shall be unclean. On the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised. Then she shall remain in the blood of her purification for thirty-three days; she shall not touch any consecrated thing, nor enter the sanctuary until the days of her purification are completed. But if she bears a female child, then she shall be unclean for two weeks, as in her menstruation; and she shall remain in the blood of her purification for sixty-six days.
‘When the days of her purification are completed, for a son or for a daughter, she shall bring to the priest at the doorway of the tent of meeting a one-year old lamb for a burnt offering and a young pigeon or a turtledove for a sin offering. Then he shall offer it before the Lord and make atonement for her, and she shall be cleansed from the flow of her blood. This is the law for her who bears a child, whether a male or a female. But if she cannot afford a lamb, then she shall take two turtledoves or two young pigeons, the one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering; and the priest shall make atonement for her, and she will be clean.’”
Thoughts on the Passage
My initial thought in reading this passage this time around was that if ever there was a portion of Scripture that the women’s lib movement could call sexist, this was it.
At face value, the passage clearly distinguishes between having a male and a female child. When a male child is born, the woman is ‘unclean’ for seven days and then she remains unwashed for thirty-three days, not allowed to touch any consecrated thing nor enter into a place of worship during that time. Meanwhile, the son will have been circumcised on the eighth day.
If the woman has a female child, she is deemed unclean for twice as long (two weeks) and also remains unwashed for twice as long (sixty-six days).  One assumes the restrictions for that period are the same as for when she has a male child.
When those respective periods are over, the mother is to somehow acquire a one-year old lamb and take it to the priest for burnt offering, as well as a young pigeon or a dove for a sin offering.  The priest offers these to God and makes atonement for her (I suppose for having a child, or perhaps for being unclean), after which she is or can be cleansed from her blood. 
The passage ends with the provision to double up on the pigeons or doves if the woman cannot afford to purchase a one-year old lamb. Throughout the entire chapter there is no mention of the father or husband. One can easily see the argument that anti-sexists can make.
In the New Testament, in Luke chapter 2, verse 24 we read that Mary, the mother of Jesus, at the end of her period of purification, after having given birth to Jesus, offered a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons for the sacrifice that needed to be made. This was an indication that young Joseph and his wife were not from a wealthy family.
Now let’s see what we can make of this whole passage:
Robert Jamieson writes (regarding the days of the mother being purified), “Though the occasion was of a festive character, yet the sacrifices appointed were not a peace offering, but a burnt offering and sin offering, in order to impress the mind of the parent with recollections of the origin of sin, and that the child inherited a fallen and sinful nature.
David Guzik has many good thoughts on this passage.  He writes:
“The commanded time of ceremonial impurity should not be regarded as a negative attitude towards birth or childbearing on God's part. God commands childbearing, in that man is commanded to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28), children are regarded as a gift from God (Psalm 127:3), and a woman with many kids is considered blessed (Psalm 128:3).
“The key to understanding this ceremony is to understand the idea of original sin. As wonderful as a new baby is, God wanted it to be remembered that with every birth another sinner was brought into the world, and the woman was here symbolically responsible for bringing a new sinner into the world. Perhaps just as importantly, the time of ceremonial impurity gave the new mother a time of rest and seclusion.” Something that might be welcomed by many.
On the issue of why the purification time requirements were twice as long for a female child, Guzik suggests the following:
“The longer period of ceremonial uncleanness for the birth of a daughter should not be understood as a penalty. Instead, it is linked to the idea stated in the previous verses – that the time of impurity is for the symbolic responsibility of bringing other sinners into the world. When giving birth to a female, a mother brings a sinner into the world who will bring still other sinners into the world.”  I understand how, when many have thrown out the idea of sin altogether today, this would not make a lot of sense.  But I believe, symbolically, what Guzik offers here is a possible explanation of the passage.
Guzik also tells us that some “also suggest the longer period of time in connection with the birth of a girl was because girls are usually smaller at birth, and this would allow more time for the mother's focused care and attention on the child. As well, since sons were more prized, the longer time at home for a mother with a newborn girl would force the family to bond more deeply, over a more extended period of time.” Perhaps.
Matthew Henry on the other hand, offers no reason for the difference in treatment between a male and female child, except for “the will of the Maker” since God created them male and female from the beginning, as equals. I personally like Guzik’s efforts to at least attribute some cause to God’s deliberate distinctions here, even if as humans, we may never know fully what God had in mind. Suffice it for me that there is an explanation.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.

Monday, January 02, 2012

They want us to ask a child, "Which gender pronoun do you prefer we use for you?" Coming to California and then to your school.

"Gender liberation" is now the new push for the GLBT agenda. It claims we MUST 'liberate' children from unnecessary 'stereotypes'. God must have made a mistake when He (dare I say) made us male and female.

And while we're at it, let's designate restrooms (in schools?) as "gender neutral". And they're doing it all in the name of . . . wait for it, . . . ah yes, the old, "let's be more tolerant of differences" rationale.

Here are the details of what gave rise to this blog. . .

You won’t believe what’s ‘next’ in radical sex agenda

[Are you looking for a speaker at your church, your club, school, or organization? Ken is available to preach, teach, challenge, and/or motivate. Please contact us.]

Thanks for dropping by. Sign up to receive free updates. We bring you relevant information from all sorts of sources. Subscribe for free to this blog or follow us by clicking on the appropriate link in the right side bar. And please share this blog with your friends. Ken Godevenos, Church and Management Consultant, Accord Consulting.

It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.