I received a subscription to Canada’s National Post for Christmas. The paper’s ‘Letters’ page, December 31, 2012, was dedicated to an idea suggested earlier by one of their readers, Esther Paul. Esther had recommended to Paul Russell, the Letters editor, that readers be asked, “What gives them joy/satisfaction/what are they grateful for.”
From what I could see, the majority of printed letters were
indeed “quite heartwarming” as the paper said.
People were grateful for family and friends. Some were thankful there was a God. Others were thankful for what Canada offers,
or for their health, or for a free press, and a slew of other reasons.
But two letters in particular caught my attention. The first was under a sub-heading that read, “Grateful that there is not a God”. It was by an A. Hughes from Thorold,
Ontario. He wrote:
Your
question is an open invitation to believers to go on about religion. In response to them I have to say that I’m
happy that I don’t believe in any sort of god.
Indeed, it even gives me joy.
The second one was printed under a heading that read, “Nothing to be grateful for”. Another man, A. Sotto, sent it in from
Montreal, Quebec. He wrote:
I
have nothing to be grateful for.
Cigarettes are expensive and the winters here are long and harsh. However, I enjoyed watching ‘La Traviata’ [an
opera by Verdi] at the Salle Wilfrid
Pelletier [a Montreal concert hall].
What do we really have here as represented by these two
letters? In the first case, Mr. Hughes,
in my opinion, demonstrates evidence of a “man angry at God”. He takes issue with the very question the
editor asked of readers. Why does his
mind immediately go to the idea that joy/satisfaction/being grateful can be
only somehow related to God or belief in a religious faith? May I suggest it is because a) finding true
joy/satisfaction/reasons-for-gratefulness is indeed related to knowing God
personally and Mr. Hughes’ inner-self knows that but refuses to accept it, and
b) that the writer was in some way irate that it is so, especially since he
denies God’s existence. At the same
time, the writer feels it necessary that he have some sort of joy nonetheless
and insists that he has found it in his ability to believe there is no
God. Unfortunately, one’s belief that
something (or Someone) does not exist does not make it so.
[As an example,
denying that something more devious and evil, involving well-known and
previously trusted Americans, was the cause of the destruction of the three
World Trade Center buildings of 9/11 fame – something like ‘controlled
demolition’ as is coming to light by scientific research these days -- and instead
choosing to believe the ‘official but unscientific story’ that they were solely
downed by two ordinary commercial airplanes under the control of Muslims crashing
into them and the resultant fires that were observed, does not necessarily make
the latter to be a fact. But that’s
another story for another time. In the
meantime, readers may want to check out https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
and then https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=n_fp5kaVYhk
for more information on this. But be
warned, it may well shake your foundational beliefs in your country, your
government, and mankind.]
Let us look at the letter of the second writer, Mr.
Sotto. His submission too is
puzzling. He offers the statement that
he has “nothing to be grateful about”.
And why is that? Well, if you
believed him, it is because “cigarettes are expensive” and “winters (where he
lives) are long and harsh.” If I had a
chance to spend a little time with Mr. Sotto, I am sure we could find a number
of things for which he could be grateful if he so chose. Among them would be the fact that he is still
alive to enjoy some of the benefits that this country does indeed have to
offer. While cigarettes may be
expensive, surely he can be thankful for the fact that he does, even from time
to time, have sufficient money to purchase them for his self-satisfaction (that
is assuming he hasn’t given up smoking which I very much doubt). Perhaps he could be grateful for the very
source of those funds. And then Mr.
Motto himself offers a cause for joy (surely we can say we are ‘grateful’ for
things that cause us ‘joy’) when he talks about the opportunity he had to see a
great opera at a wonderful concert hall.
So, you see, even those that at first reaction have nothing to be
grateful for, even they have something and often, have much, to be grateful
for. [
I am reminded of the reaction I observe in my grandchildren sometimes when they
are missing one thing they want right now, the whole world of blessings
they have and are surrounded by, are easily forgotten.]
We can well ask what then makes the difference between a
joyful or grateful individual and one who thinks and talks and feels as if he
or she is not? The answer is simple (at
least to me). It is a matter of the
intellect and the emotion. It is a
matter of what one thinks in one’s head and what one feels in one’s heart. And then of course, one has to consciously
decide what that is and stick to it. I,
for one, have chosen to believe there is a God, and that makes it easy for me
to see all the things in my life for which I am joyous and grateful about. My family, my health, my life and opportunities
in general, my ability and desire to help others, and so on – all these are seen
by me as a gift from God. The only thing
I have to do is make the decision that what my head and heart are telling me I
will stick with.
At the same time, I do realize that it is possible for some to experience the same joy and sense of being grateful without believing in God. The only problem that arises with that approach is how one might then a) explain the presence and absence of these things for which they are happy about and grateful, in their lives, or in the lives of others; and b) who is such a person being “thankful” or “grateful” to, or from whom are we withhold such thankfulness. The actual meaning of the phrase “thank you” makes sense when we consider that normally when we express it, we are shifting “responsibility” in a positive way from ourselves to someone else. [For example, when your arms are full of grocery bags and you have to get through a door, and I come along and open that door for you, you say “thank you” because I have in essence taken that ‘responsibility’ from you and transferred it to myself as you allow me to. You would not be saying ‘thank you’ if you refused to allow me to open the door for you, even if I did.] So I would ask anyone who thinks like Mr. Sotto, “Who is taking on the responsibility of making you “thankful” by giving you any joy or gratefulness in anything?”
At the same time, I do realize that it is possible for some to experience the same joy and sense of being grateful without believing in God. The only problem that arises with that approach is how one might then a) explain the presence and absence of these things for which they are happy about and grateful, in their lives, or in the lives of others; and b) who is such a person being “thankful” or “grateful” to, or from whom are we withhold such thankfulness. The actual meaning of the phrase “thank you” makes sense when we consider that normally when we express it, we are shifting “responsibility” in a positive way from ourselves to someone else. [For example, when your arms are full of grocery bags and you have to get through a door, and I come along and open that door for you, you say “thank you” because I have in essence taken that ‘responsibility’ from you and transferred it to myself as you allow me to. You would not be saying ‘thank you’ if you refused to allow me to open the door for you, even if I did.] So I would ask anyone who thinks like Mr. Sotto, “Who is taking on the responsibility of making you “thankful” by giving you any joy or gratefulness in anything?”
Finally, there are three verses in the New Testament of the
Bible, found in Matthew 26:11, Mark 14:7, and John 12:8, where Jesus says, “The
poor you will always have with you.” Commentators
have translated that very literally and for good reason if one understands the
full context of the wording. But
somehow, I cannot help but think that Jesus may also mean those that are “poor
in the sense that they cannot be joyful or grateful” and those who refuse to
shift the responsibility for life and its blessings to Him.
I hope Mssrs. Hughes and Sotto and the many they represent
will indeed find more reasons to be joyous and thankful in 2013. More importantly, it is my wish that more of
us who have this JOY will indeed take the time necessary to find the joyless
and the ungrateful in this world, like these two honest men, or at least those
that God puts in our path, and simply share with them our own source of this
most-valued asset.
[Are you
looking for a speaker at your church, your club, school, or organization? Ken
is available to preach, teach, challenge, and/or motivate. Please contact us.]
Thanks for dropping
by. Sign up to receive free updates. We bring you relevant information from all
sorts of sources. Subscribe for free to this blog or follow us by clicking on
the appropriate link in the right side bar. And please share this blog with
your friends. Ken Godevenos, Church and Management Consultant, Accord Consulting. And while you’re here, why not check out some
more of our recent blogs shown in the right hand column. Ken.
It would be great if you would share your thoughts or questions on this blog in the comments section below or on social media.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment.